The Campaign of Waterloo: A Military History: Third EditionRopes, John Codman
History
The Campaign of Waterloo: A Military History: Third Edition
Ropes, John Codman
Napoleon I, Emperor of the French, 1769-1821 -- Elba and the Hundred Days, 1814-1815; Waterloo, Battle of, Waterloo, Belgium, 1815
[462] This mistake could not have been made, as Ollech points out (p.
172) if the battle had been decided before nightfall.
[463] As a matter of fact, these troops were not a part of a column in
retreat for Namur; but, of course, this could not be known at once. See
Siborne, vol. 1, pp. 286, 287. Clausewitz, ch. 37, p. 92.
[464] Jomini states (p. 150, n.) that General Monthion reconnoitred
in the direction of Tilly and Mont St. Guibert in pursuance of orders
given him by the Emperor on the morning of the 17th. Siborne, vol. 1,
p. 317, states that Domon’s cavalry division of the 3d Corps, which had
been temporarily attached to the main column, reconnoitred the country
between the Brussels road and the Dyle. This must have been, however,
in the afternoon of the 17th.
[465] Grouchy, Obs., p. 12 _et seq._
[466] Fragments Hist., Lettre à MM. Méry et Barthélemy; pp. 4, 5.
Grouchy Mem., vol. 4, p. 44.
[467] Grouchy, Obs. p. 13.
[468] Ollech, p. 171. _Cf._ Clausewitz, ch. 51.
[469] This subject will be treated of in Appendix B; _post_, p. 355.
[470] Charras, vol. 1, p. 240.
[471] Berton, pp. 47, 48. Berton supposed it to be the corps of Bülow,
but it was really that of Thielemann. Ollech, p. 157.
[472] Pascallet, p. 79. Charras, vol. 1, p. 241. Appendix B; _post_, p.
358.
[473] This division belonged to the 6th Corps.
[474] Namur lay nearly south-east and Maestricht nearly north-east from
Sombreffe.
[475] The italics are ours.
[476] The original is “_et_,” but this is plainly an error, very
possibly caused by the fact that the letter was dictated.
[477] The italics are ours.
[478] There are other readings varying in unimportant points from the
above.
[479] Whether it was wise under these circumstances for Napoleon to
detach such a large force as that which he intrusted to Grouchy, is a
question which will be discussed in the notes to Chapter XV.
[480] Charras, vol. 1, p. 242.
[481] Ib., vol. 1, p. 238.
[482] Gérard: Dernières Obs., p. 15; Charras, vol. 1, p. 244;
Siborne, vol. 1, p. 297. Of the mutilations in the text affecting the
significance of this letter, contained in the Grouchy Memoirs, notice
will be taken in Appendix B, _post_, p. 359, where a full copy of it
will be given.
[483] The italics are ours.
[484] Charras, vol. 1, p. 249.
[485] Ib., pp. 236, 237.
[486] Charras, vol. 1, p. 250.
[487] _Cf._ Napoléon à Waterloo, p. 181.
[488] Charras, vol. 1, p. 250.
[489] Gourgaud, pp. 77, 78; Corresp., vol. 31, p. 214.
[490] _Ante_, p. 47.
[491] Le Maréchal Drouet, p. 96.
[492] Napoléon à Waterloo, pp. 185, 186.
[493] _Cf._ Gourgaud, pp. 78, 79. _Cf._ Mercer’s Diary, vol. 1, p. 269.
_NOTES TO CHAPTER XIII._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account