The Campaigns and History of the Royal Irish Regiment, [v. 1,] from 1684 to 1902Gretton, G. le M. (George Le Mesurier)
History
The Campaigns and History of the Royal Irish Regiment, [v. 1,] from 1684 to 1902
Gretton, G. le M. (George Le Mesurier)
Great Britain. Army. Royal Irish Regiment
Though Hood, as a sailor, was unversed in the military branches of
the art of war, he decided after a reconnaissance of Bastia that it
would be possible for the troops to carry the defences by a sudden
assault from the land side of the town. Dundas, who though cautious
by temperament was an educated soldier of much experience, condemned
the project as beyond the powers of his small and ill-equipped force,
and this difference of opinion at once intensified the friction
already existing between the Admiral and the General. Unable to
agree on a plan of operations, Hood and Dundas summoned conferences
and councils of war, at which no decision was reached; and their
relations became so strained that they ceased to meet, transacting
business by means of formal and acrimonious correspondence.
Throughout the army the question was hotly debated, and Bastia was
reconnoitred by many officers, the large majority of whom became
converts to Dundas’s opinions. Lieutenant-Colonel Wemyss, who
commanded the XVIIIth, was one of the few in favour of an attack,
but his views do not appear to have been supported by convincing
arguments, for Sir John Moore (then Lieutenant-Colonel Moore, 51st
regiment) recorded in his diary that “Wemyss conceives it would be
mighty easy to take them” (_i.e._, the heights commanding the land
fortifications), “but cannot explain how, and talks so like a boy
that little weight can be given to his opinion.”[91] Hood’s conduct
towards the General and the troops became so intolerable that Dundas
took the unjustifiable step of resigning his command and returning
to England. Not long after his departure reinforcements reached the
officer in temporary command of the army, whose offer to co-operate
in the operations was contemptuously rejected by Lord Hood; and
thus, when on May 24th the garrison of 4500 men surrendered, the
success was due to the Navy, whose blockading vessels had fairly
starved the French into submission, while, with the exception of some
artillerymen and the troops serving on the warships as marines, the
land forces were hardly employed in the reduction of Bastia.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account