The Campaigns and History of the Royal Irish Regiment, [v. 1,] from 1684 to 1902Gretton, G. le M. (George Le Mesurier)
History
The Campaigns and History of the Royal Irish Regiment, [v. 1,] from 1684 to 1902
Gretton, G. le M. (George Le Mesurier)
Great Britain. Army. Royal Irish Regiment
work was carried out in the depth of winter; the docks occasionally
flooded, the shafts filled with water, the pumps choked with frost;
but all ranks united to overcome difficulties, and the mass of ruins
is a proof of the success attending the cheerful performance of a
laborious duty.”
This official record is not the only testimony to the good behaviour
of the Royal Irish while they worked like navvies in the docks.
General C. G. Gordon, who as a young officer of Royal Engineers had
served in the Crimea, replied to a request for information about the
doings of the XVIIIth at the siege of Sebastopol in a characteristic
letter:--
“PORT LOUIS, 3/3/82.
“MY DEAR MAJOR SAVILE,--Thanks for your note received to-day. I
am afraid I cannot write anything which would be of value about
the 18th Royal Irish, as it is now 28 years ago or nearly so,
since the Crimea. I know that they were a favourite regiment with
the R.E. for work, both in the trenches and in the destruction
of the docks, from the energy and pluck of the officers and men,
and it was then that I formed my opinion of Irishmen being of a
different nature than other Britishers inasmuch as they required
a certain management and consideration, which, if given them,
would enable you, so to speak, to hold their lives in your hand.
The officers liked the men and the men liked the officers; they
were a jovial lot altogether, but they would do anything if you
spoke and treated them as if you liked them, which I certainly
did. You know what great hardships they went through in the Docks
in working at the shafts which, 30 feet deep, were often full
of water, if left, unpumped out, for 12 hours. Poor devils! wet,
draggled, in their low ammunition boots, I used to feel much for
them, for the Generals used to be down on them because they were
troublesome, which they were when people did not know how to
manage them.
“Kindest regards to General Edwards, a fine, clever old officer
who had all our respect.
“I am sorry I can write you no details.--Believe me, yours
sincerely,
“C. G. GORDON.”
It will be noticed that neither in the official expression of thanks
nor in Gordon’s letter is there any reference to the fact that the
Russians frequently shelled the working parties at the docks. The
troops were so used to being under fire that they looked upon it as
an everyday occurrence, and a few casualties were considered unworthy
of notice. Thanks, however, to Colonel Elliot’s diary, we know that
rheumatic fever and frost-bite were not the only dangers to which the
Royal Irish were exposed. On December 3, 1855, the Russians fired two
hundred and fifty shells, wounding four men of the regiment; on the
21st they dropped three shells into a barrack-room, luckily without
hitting any one, but smashing beds, knapsacks, and rifles in every
direction; on the last day of the year a shell carried away the arm
of a private, ---- Fitzgerald.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account