The Campaigns and History of the Royal Irish Regiment, [v. 1,] from 1684 to 1902Gretton, G. le M. (George Le Mesurier)
History
The Campaigns and History of the Royal Irish Regiment, [v. 1,] from 1684 to 1902
Gretton, G. le M. (George Le Mesurier)
Great Britain. Army. Royal Irish Regiment
In September, 1883, Hicks, acting under the orders of the Egyptian
government, led an expedition into the depths of Kordofan, where the
Mahdi had retired to organise the tribesmen, from thirty to sixty
thousand strong, whom his recent victories had attracted to his
standard. Hicks commanded about 11,000 weakly and ill-fed men, of
whom many were so unwilling to be soldiers that to prevent desertion
they had to be sent up the Nile in chains. His artillery consisted of
thirty-six Krupp, Nordenfelt, and mountain guns, and his transport
was supplied by six thousand horses and camels. The whole of the
Egyptian troops were thoroughly out of heart; they were aware that
they were about to march into a country of which little was known
except that it was almost waterless, and that they would encounter
hordes of desperate and ruthless fanatics. As the men filed out of
Khartoum they were in floods of tears. The fate of such an army
may easily be imagined: on the 5th of November it was surprised by
the Mahdi with 40,000 of his followers, and cut to pieces, near El
Obeid in Kordofan.[253] Hicks and the other Europeans died fighting
dauntlessly to the last; the Egyptians allowed themselves to be
butchered almost without resistance: three hundred were given
quarter, only to become the slaves of the victors, into whose hands
passed the guns, much ammunition, thousands of rifles, and all
the transport animals. One man alone escaped to bring the news to
Khartoum. Yet so little was the importance of the Mahdist movement
appreciated by the English government that at the very time Hicks’s
column was being destroyed in Kordofan, Mr Gladstone was urging the
reduction of the British army of occupation in Egypt. When Hicks’s
fate became known in Cairo the situation grew very complicated. The
Cabinet in London, afraid of being drawn into armed intervention
in the Soudan, had persistently assumed an attitude of aloofness
on the subject of Hicks’s operations, and, affecting to ignore the
fact that Britain was virtually, though not officially, mistress in
Egypt, and that a word from her representative at Cairo, Lord Cromer
(then Sir Evelyn Baring), would have stopped the expedition, declined
all responsibility on the ground that it had been undertaken solely
on the authority of the Egyptian government. The annihilation of
Hicks’s army had placed Khartoum in a position of great danger: only
two thousand troops were left to man the four miles of earthworks
by which the town was ringed, and its communications with Cairo
and Suakim were seriously threatened. The generals in command of
the British army at Cairo admitted that, if the Mahdi advanced
on Khartoum, it would be impossible to hold it in its existing
condition, and that in all probability the whole valley of the Nile,
as far south as Wadi Halfa, would be lost to Egypt. Alarmed at the
crushing blow which had befallen him, and at the consequences likely
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account