Laurier did not see this, but many of his party did and refused to
support him in reciprocity.
At time of writing, to an outsider, there is in practice no difference
between the two parties; but this can hardly remain a permanent
condition. As long as the war lasts both parties will be a unit in
support of Imperial defense. The day the war is over Canada may have to
consider, not Imperial, but Dominion defense; and this is bound to split
the parties up on entirely new lines. The French Nationalists are for
standing aside from all European entanglements and resting secure under
the Monroe Doctrine. The two million Americans in the West may be
expected to advocate the same policy. The British and the Canadians of
British descent in Canada may be expected to take an aggressive stand for
active self-defense; for defense may be one of Canada's next big problems.
Up to the present, Canadians have considered it a superiority that their
constitution--the British North America Act--could be so easily amended.
As long as Canada is peopled by Canadians, it is an advantage to work
under a constitution that may be modified to suit the growing need of a
growing nation, but one is constrained to ask what if Galicians and
Germans ever acquired the balance of voting power in Canada? There are
half as many German-born Germans in the United States as there are
native-born Canadians in Canada. What if such a tide of German
immigration came to Canada? Would it be an advantage or a disadvantage
that the country's constitution could be so easily amended by the
Imperial Parliament? Or more striking still, suppose the Hindu, a
British subject, began peopling Western Canada by the million. Suppose
the Hindu, a British subject, voted in Canada for a change in the
constitution! Can one conceive for one minute of the Imperial government
refusing to amend the British North American Act? Canadians sometimes
refer to the American Constitution as too fixed and inelastic for modern
conditions. They sometimes wonder how certain famous constitutional
lawyers could make a living without the American Constitution to
interpret and argue before the Supreme Court, but Americans and Canadians
are to-day working out from different angles a great world experiment in
self-government. It remains to be seen which experiment will stand the
stress of world-convulsing changes. We need not theorize. Time will
arbitrate.
CHAPTER XIV
THE LIFE OF THE PEOPLE
I
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account