Conditioning these movements of population have been Canada's climate,
her backwoods and prairie and frontier hardship--challenging the
weakling, strengthening the strong. No country affords more
opportunity to the fit man and none is crueler to the unfit than
Canada. I like this fact that Canada is hard at first. It is the
flaming sword guarding the Paradise of effort from the vices of inert
softened races. Diamonds are hard. Charcoals are soft, though both
are the very same thing.
Canada affords the shortest safest route to the Orient.
Canada has natural resources of mine, forest, fishery, land to supply
an empire of a hundred million; to supply Europe, if need arose.
She must some day become one of the umpires of fate on the Pacific.
She yearly interweaves tighter commercial bonds with the United States,
yet refuses to come under American government. It may be predicted
both these conditions will remain permanent.
Panama will quicken her west coast to a second Japan.
Yearly the West will exert greater political power, and the East less;
for the preponderance of immigration settles West not East.
As long as she has free land Canada will be free of labor unrest, but
the dangers of industrialism menace her in a transfer of population
from farm to factory.
In twenty years Canada will have as many British born within her
borders as there were Englishmen in England in the days of Queen
Elizabeth.
In twenty years Canada will have more foreign-born than there are
native-born Canadians.
Her pressing problems to-day are the amalgamation of the foreigner
through her schools; a working arrangement with the Oriental fair to
him as to her; the development of her natural resources; the anchoring
of the people to the land; and the building of a system of powerful
national defense by sea and land.
Her constitution is elastic and pliable to every new emergency--it may
be, too pliable; and her system of justice stands high.
She has a fanatical patriotism; but it is not yet vocal in art, or
literature; and it is--do not mistake it--loyalty to an ideal, not to a
dynasty, nor to a country. She loves Britain because Britain stands
for that ideal.
Stand back from all these facts! They may be slow-moving ponderous
facts. They may be contradictory and inconsistent. What that moves
ever is consistent? But like a fleet tacking to sea, though the course
shift and veer, it is ever forward. Forward whither--do you ask of
Canada?
There is no man with an open free mind can ponder these facts and not
answer forthwith and without faltering--_to a democratised edition of a
Greater Britain Overseas_. Only a world cataclysm or national upheaval
displacing every nation from its foundations can shake Canada from that
destiny.
Will she grow closer to Britain or farther off? Will she grow closer
to the United States or farther off? Will she fight Japan or league
with her? Will she rig up a working arrangement with the Hindu?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account