Canada is being asked to decide and legislate on one of the most vital
race problems that ever confronted a nation. She is also being asked to
be very lily-handed and ladylike and dainty about it all. You must not
explore facts that are not--"nice." You must not ask what the Westerner
means when he says that "the Asiatic will not affiliate with our
civilization." Is it more than white teeth and pigments of the skin? Is
it more than skin deep? Had the Old Book some deep economic reason when
it warned the children of Israel against mixing their blood with aliens?
Has it all anything to do with the centuries' cesspools of unbridled
vice? Is that the reason that women's clubs--knowing less of such
things--rather than men's clubs--are begged to pass fool resolutions
about admitting races of whose living practices they know absolutely
nothing?
If it isn't the labor unions and it isn't the fear of new national power
that prejudice against the Oriental--what is it? Why has almost every
woman's club on the Pacific passed resolutions against the admission of
the Oriental, and almost every woman's club in the East passed
resolutions for the admission? Why did the former Minister of Labor in
Canada say that "a minimum of publicity is desired upon this subject"?
What did he mean when he declared "that the native of India is not a
person suited to this country"? If the native Hindu is "not a person
suited to Canada"--climate, soil, moisture, what not?--why isn't that
fact sufficient to exclude the Oriental without any legislation?
Italians never go to live at the North Pole. Nor do Eskimos come to live
in the tropics.
You may ask questions about Hindu immigration till you are black in the
face. Unless you go out on the spot to the Pacific Coast, the most you
will get for an answer is a "hush." And it would not be such an
impossible situation if the other side were also going around with a
finger to the lip and a "hush"; but the Oriental isn't. The Hindu and
his advocates go from one end of Canada to the other clamoring at the
tops of their voices, not for the privilege, but for the right, of
admission to Canada, the right to vote, the right to colonize. At the
time the first five or six thousand were dumped on the Pacific Coast,
twenty thousand more were waiting to take passage; and one hundred
thousand more were waiting to take passage after them, clamoring for the
right of admission, the right to vote, the right to colonize. Canada
welcomes all other colonists. Why not these? The minute you ask, you
are told to "hush."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account