_ 166 Testam. Benj._ 11, p. 201, ed. Sinker.
_ 167 Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Theologie_, 1875, p. 490, _et
seq._
168 Ἐν τόις ἀπομνημονέυμασαι, ἄ φημι ὑπὸ τῶν ἀποστόλων αὐτοῦ καὶ τῶν
ἐκείνοις παρακολουθησάντων συντετάχθαι. Sec. 103. Here “the
apostles” are not necessarily Matthew and John. Apocryphal gospels
then current bore the name of apostles or their attendants,—of
Peter, James, Nicodemus, Matthias, &c.
169 Καὶ τὸ εἰπεῖν μετωνομακέναι αὐτὸν Πέτρον καὶ γεγράφθαι ἐν τοῖς
ἀπομνημονεύμασαι αὐτοῦ γεγενημένον καὶ τοῦτο, μετὰ τοῦ καὶ, κ. τ. λ.
Dial. cum Tryph., 106. Here the pronoun αὐτοῦ probably refers to
Peter. And the expression “his memoirs” can hardly mean Mark’s
gospel, since Jerome is the first that calls it such.
_ 170 Dialogus_, part ii., p. 315, ed. Thirlby. Comp. on Justin,
Tjeenk-Willink’s _Justinus Martyr in zijne Verhouding tot Paulus_.
_ 171 Apolog._ i. 97, ed. Thirlby.
_ 172 Hieronymi Prooem._ in _Epist. ad Titum._
173 Comp. chap. xii., where γραφαί is applied to the apostolic epistles;
a title they did not receive so early as the age of Polycarp. Zahn
himself admits this.
174 Chapter xiv. 2.
175 Chapter ii. 4.
176 See _Clementis Romani ad Corinthios quae discuntur epistulae, ed. de
Gebhardt et Harnack_, 2., sec. 10, Prolegomena.
_ 177 Legat. pro Christ._ II, 12.
_ 178 Ibid._ 33.
179 Chapter xviii.
_ 180 Ap._ Euseb. H. E., iv. 23.
_ 181 Ap_. Euseb. H. E., v. 1, p. 144, ed. Bright.
182 θεῖος λόγος. _Ad Autolycum_, iii. 14, p. 1141, ed Migne.
_ 183 Ibid._, ii. 22.
184 Epist. 151, ad Algasiam.
185 See Overbeck’s _Studien zur Geschichte der alten Kirche, Abhandlung_
I., in which the date of the letter is brought down till after
Constantine. Surely this is too late.
186 Davidson’s _Introduction to the Study of the New Testament_, vol.
ii. p. 508, &c.
187 τὸ εὐαγγέλιον.
188 ὁ ἀπόστολος.
_ 189 Adves. Hæres._, iv. 20, 2.
_ 190 Stromateis_, ii. 6, p. 965, ed. Migne.
_ 191 Ibid._, iv. 17, p. 1312.
_ 192 Ibid._, i. 29, p. 928.
_ 193 De Oratione_, cap. 12.
_ 194 De Pudicitia_, cap. 10-20.
195 G. of St. Paul’s epistles, a MS. of the ninth century according to
Tischendorf.
196 See Anger’s _Ueber den Laodicener Brief_, 1843.
_ 197 Fertur etiam ad Laudecences alia ad Alexandrinos Pauli nomine
fincte ad hesem Marcionis el alia plura quæ in Catholicam ecclesiam
recepi non potest._ Perhaps a comma should be put after _nomine_,
and _fincte_ joined to what follows, to the _alia plura_ said to be
forged in the interest of Marcion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account