The case of Miss ElliottOrczy, Emmuska Orczy, Baroness
General
The case of Miss Elliott
Orczy, Emmuska Orczy, Baroness
Detective and mystery stories, English; English fiction -- 20th century
“‘Samuel Holder was mistaken,’ she replied imperturbably; ‘I wasn’t
out of the house the whole of that night.’
“It would be useless for me,” continued the man in the corner, “to
attempt to convey to you the intense feeling of excitement which
pervaded that crowded court, as that wizened little figure stood there
for over half-an-hour, quietly and obstinately parrying the most rigid
cross-examination.
“That she was lying—lying to shield the very man who perhaps had
murdered her father—no one doubted for a single instant. Yet there she
stood, sullen, apathetic, and defiant, flatly denying Samuel Holder’s
story from end to end, strictly adhering and swearing to her first
statement, that her father went out ‘on his own,’ that she did not
know where he was going to, and that she herself had never left the
house that fatal Tuesday night.
“It did not seem to occur to her that by these statements she was
hopelessly incriminating Samuel Holder, whom she was thus openly
accusing of deliberate lies; on the contrary, many noticed a distinct
touch of bitter animosity in the young girl against her former
sweetheart, which was singularly emphasised when the coroner asked her
whether she approved of the idea of a breach of promise action being
brought against Mr. Ledbury.
“‘No,’ she said; ‘all that talk about damages and breach of promise
was between father and Sam Holder, because Sam had told father that he
wouldn’t mind marrying me if I had £5,000 of my own.’
“It would be impossible to render the tone of hatred and contempt with
which the young girl uttered these words. One seemed to live through
the whole tragedy of the past few months—the girl, pestered by the
greed of her father, yet refusing obstinately to aid in causing a
scandal, perhaps disgrace, to the man whom she had once loved and
trusted.
“As nothing more could be got out of her, and as circumstances now
seemed to demand it, the coroner adjourned the inquest. The police, as
you may well imagine, wanted to make certain enquiries. Mind you, Mary
Newton flatly refused to mention Mr. Ledbury’s name; she was
questioned and cross-questioned, yet her answer uniformly was:
“‘I don’t know what you’re talking about. The person I was going to
marry four years ago has gone out of my life—I have never seen him
since. I saw no one on that Tuesday night.’
“Against that, when she was asked to swear that it was _not_ Mr.—now
Captain—Ledbury who had promised her marriage she flatly refused to do
so.
“Of course, there was not a soul there who had not made up his or her
mind that Captain Ledbury _had_ met Mary Newton in the lane, and had
heard from her that all his love letters to her were now in her
father’s hands, and that the old man meant to use these in order to
extort money from him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account