"They are all alike; there has been no complete or serious work produced on symbolism since the Middle Ages, for the Abbe Auber's work on the subject is a delusion. In vain will you seek for a treatise on flowers which even alludes to the Catholic significance of plants. I do not, of course, mean those silly books compiled for lovers, and called the Language of Flowers, which you may find on the bookstalls with old cookery-books and dream-books. It is the same with regard to colours; nothing proven or authentic has been written concerning infernal or celestial hues; for in fact the treatise by Frederic Portal is worthless. To explain Angelico's work I had to hunt here and there through the Mystics, to discover where I might the meanings they ascribe to colours; and I see plainly that I must do the same for my article on the emblematical fauna. There is, on the whole, nothing to be found in technical works; it is in the Bible and in the Liturgy, the fountain-head of symbolical lore, that I must cast my net. By the way, Monsieur l'Abbe, had you not some remarks to communicate on the zoology of the Scriptures?" "Yes, we will go--" "To dinner, if you please," said Madame Bavoil. The Abbe Gevresin said grace, and when they had eaten the soup the housekeeper served the beef. It was strengthening, tender, savoury to its inmost fibre, penetrated by the rich and highly-flavoured sauce. "You don't get the like at La Trappe, our friend, eh?" said Madame Bavoil. "Nor will he get anything so good at any other religious retreat," said the Abbe Plomb. "Do not discourage me beforehand," said Durtal, laughing; "let me enjoy this without a pang--there is a time for all things." "Then you are fully determined," said the Abbe Gevresin, "to write a paper for your _Review_ on allegorical beasts?" "Yes, Monsieur l'Abbe." "I have made a list for you from the works of Fillion and of Lesetre of the blunders made by the translators of the Bible when they disguised real beasts under chimerical names," said the Abbe Plomb. "This, in a few words, is the upshot of my researches. "There was never any mythological fauna in the Sacred Books. The Hebrew text was misread by those who translated it into Greek and Latin, and the strange zoology that we find in certain chapters of Isaiah and Job is easily reduced to the nomenclature of well-known creatures. "Thus the onocentaurs and sirens, spoken of by the Prophet, are neither more nor less than jackals, if we examine the Hebrew original. The lamia, a vampire, half woman and half serpent like the wyvern, is a night bird, the white or the screech owl; the satyrs and fauns, the hairy beasts spoken of in the Vulgate, are, after all, no more than wild goats--'schirim,' as they are called in the Mosaic original.