“Ours is not a public meeting, but a mere private gathering,” explained the chairman. “None but men of Christian principles have been invited. If others have intruded violently, I request them to leave the room, or, at least, to refrain from conduct unbecoming men of good‐breeding.” Spitzkopf laughed aloud, his comrades yelled and stamped. “Let us go!” said Greifmann to Gerlach in an angry tone. “Let us stay!” rejoined the latter with excitement. “The affair is becoming interesting. I want to see how this will end.” The banker noticed Gerlach’s suppressed indignation; he observed it in the fire of his eyes and the expression of unutterable contempt that had spread over his features, and he began to consider the situation as alarming. He had not expected this exhibition of brutal impertinence. In his estimation an infringement of propriety like the one he had just witnessed was a far more heinous transgression than the grossest violations in the sphere of morals. He judged of Gerlach’s impressions by this standard of appreciation, and feared the behavior of the progressionist mob would produce an effect in the young man’s mind far from favorable to the cause which they represented. He execrated the disturbance of the liberals, and took Seraphin’s arm to lead him away. “Come away, I beg of you! I cannot imagine what interest the rudeness of that uncultivated horde can have for you.” “Do not scorn them, for they are honestly earning their pay,” rejoined Gerlach. “What do you mean?” “Those fellows are whistling, bawling, stamping, and yelling in the employ of progress. You are trying to give me an insight into the nature of modern civilization: could there be a better opportunity than this?” “There you make a mistake, my dear fellow! Enlightened progress is never rude.” To Be Continued. Gavazzi Versus The See Of S. Peter. By a Protestant Doctor of Philosophy. Introductory Note. The topic of this article has already been fully and satisfactorily treated in THE CATHOLIC WORLD. It is well, however, to adopt, in handling the truth, Voltaire’s maxim in regard to falsehood, and to keep continually repeating those truths which are frequently denied. Not only the mountebank Gavazzi, but others more respectable than he is, keep on reasserting the denial of S. Peter’s Roman Episcopate, notwithstanding the evidence which has been over and over again presented in proof of it by Protestant as well as Catholic writers. We, therefore, willingly give admission to the present article, which, we may as well state, has been printed from the author’s MS. copy, without any alteration.—ED. C. W. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐