The Causes of the Corruption of the Traditional Text of the Holy Gospels: Being the Sequel to The Traditional Text of the Holy GospelsBurgon, John William
Religion
The Causes of the Corruption of the Traditional Text of the Holy Gospels: Being the Sequel to The Traditional Text of the Holy Gospels
Burgon, John William
Bible. Gospels -- Criticism, Textual
[303] I have numbered the clauses for convenience.--It will perhaps
facilitate the study of this place, if (on my own responsibility) I
subjoin a representation of the same words in Latin:--
(1) Diligite inimicos vestros,
(2) benedicite maledicentes vos,
(3) benefacite odientibus vos,
(4) et orate pro calumniantibus vos,
(5) et persequentibus vos.
[304] Opp. iv. 324 _bis_, 329 _bis_, 351. Gall. xiv. App. 106.
[305] 'A large majority, all but five, omit it. Some add it in the
margin.' Traditional Text, p. 149.
[306] Opp. p. 79, cf. 146.
[307] Scap. c. 1.
[308] Opp. iv. 946.
[309] Haer. III. xviii. 5.
[310] Dem. Evan. xiii. 7.
[311] In Bapt. Christ.
[312] Orig. Opp. i. 812.
[313] Opp. i. 768: iv. 353.
[314] Opp. i. 827: ii. 399.
[315] Spect. c. 16: (Anim. c. 35): Pat. c. 6.
[316] [In Ep. Joh. IV. Tract, ix. 3 (1, 3 (ver. 45 &c.)); In Ps.
cxxxviii. 37 (1, 3); Serm. XV. 8 (1, 3, 5); Serm. LXII. _in loc._ (1, 3,
4, 5).]
[317] In Ps. xxxviii. 2.
[318] Opp. pp. 303, 297.
[319] Pro S. Athanas. ii.
[320] Ps. cxviii. 10. 16; 9. 9.
[321] Ep. ii.
[322] Opp. iii. 167: iv. 619: v. 436:--ii. 340: v. 56: xii. 654:--ii.
258: iii. 41:--iv. 267: xii. 425.
[323] Opp. iii. 379.
[324] Praep. 654: Ps. 137, 699: Es. 589.
[325] Pp. 3. 198.
[326] Opp. p. 605 and 307.
[327] Leg. pro Christian. 11.
[328] Ad Autolycum, iii. 14.
[329] Opp. i. 40.
[330] Ad Philipp. c. 12.
[331] Sec. 1.
[332] Theodoret once (iv. 946) gives the verse as Tischendorf gives it:
but on two other occasions (i. 827: ii. 399) the same Theodoret exhibits
the second member of the sentence thus,--[Greek: eulogeite tous
diokontas humas] (so pseud.-Athan. ii. 95), which shews how little
stress is to be laid on such evidence as the first-named place
furnishes.
Origen also (iv. 324 bis, 329 bis, 351) repeatedly gives the place as
Tischendorf gives it--but on one occasion, which it will be observed is
_fatal_ to his evidence (i. 768), he gives the second member thus,--iv.
353:
[Greek: kai proseuchesthe huper ton epereazonton humas].... 1. 4.
Next observe how Clemens Al. (605) handles the same place:--
[Greek: agapate tous echthrous humon, eulogeite tous kataromenous humas,
kai proseuchesthe huper ton epereazynton humin, kai ta homoia.]... 1, 2,
4.--3, 5.
Justin M. (i. 40) quoting the same place from memory (and with exceeding
licence), yet is observed to recognize in part _both_ the clauses which
labour under suspicion:... 1, 2, 4.--3, 5.
[Greek: euchesthe huper ton echthron humon kai agapate tous misountas
humas], which roughly represents [Greek: kai eulogeite tous kataromenous
humin kai euchesthe huper ton epereazonton humas].
The clause which hitherto lacks support is that which regards [Greek:
tous misountas humas]. But the required help is supplied by Irenaeus (i.
521), who (loosely enough) quotes the place thus,--
_Diligite inimicos vestros, et orate pro eis, qui vos oderunt._ ... 1
(made up of 3, 4).--2, 5.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account