The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
“A number of ecclesiastics, both regular and secular, who were
hopeful of being able to combat the Lutherans and the other
heretics of our time and to overthrow their heretical doctrines,
and who secured for the purpose permission from the Apostolic
Chair to read the works of these heretics, found themselves
confused and influenced by these writings so that they were
quite largely led astray and perverted into the acceptance of
heretical errors. It has therefore, been found necessary to
recall and to cancel all such permits issued in Briefs or in
Bulls, whether given to bishops, archbishops, or cardinals, to
marquises, dukes, kings, or emperors.”
The only exceptions to this general cancellation are in the case of
the inquisitors-general and certain cardinals, who may, from time to
time, be charged by the Curia with special duties in the examination
and classification of literature. Copies of the books condemned are
to be delivered to the officials appointed by the Inquisition for
the purpose. All the faithful are charged with the duty of giving
information concerning such copies as may become known to them. The
brief is to be published in Rome by the Inquisition and elsewhere by
each bishop in his own diocese. The lists in the first class include
(given, for the most part, in two places under both surname and
forename) Calvin, Luther, Melanchthon, Zasius, Pirckheimer. Cassander,
Blaurerus, Oecolampadius, Zwingli, Islebius, and Hütten (printed
Huldrychus Huttenus). English names to be noted are John Rogers
(printed John Rochors), Nicholas Ridley (Nic. Ridlaeus), and Thos.
Cranmer. The name of Erasmus, omitted here, finds place in Class II
against several of his works. These lists are, says Vergerio, marked by
many errors and inconsistencies. In the third class, under the heading
_Libri_ are given certain general prohibitions of which the
following may be cited as examples:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account