The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
As early as April, 1546, in the fourth session, a papal decree entitled
_De editione et usu librorum sacrorum_ was received and accepted
by the council. This presents the general grounds for the authority
of the Vulgate, the principles that are to control the interpretation
of the Scriptures, a prohibition of any wrongful use or citations of
the works of the Bible, and, finally, instructions to the council to
frame regulations for the supervision and control of the work of the
printing-press, “the operations of which as now uncontrolled tend to
pernicious license and injury to the faith of the community and to the
authority of the Church.” Certain suggestions follow concerning the
necessity for a close supervision of the text of the Scriptures to the
end that it may be printed without error, omission, or interpolation,
and the further necessity of forbidding the printing of any books
having to do with religion or with the Scriptures which have not
secured the approval of examiners appointed by the Church. The approval
of such books must be given in writing and must be recorded in every
written or printed copy. Anonymous books must in no case receive
approval.[128]
Two archbishops, Beccatelli and Selvaggio, deprecated the discussion
of the subject as calculated to impede the principal object of the
council; since Paul IV had, with the counsel and assistance of all
the Inquisitions, formed a most complete catalogue, nothing could be
added but books edited within the two years that had elapsed since
its publication, an act undeserving of the labour of the synod. To
reverse any condemnation in that Index would be to reflect imprudence
on Rome; and while such action would lessen the authority of the Index
of Paul, it would also injure the Council itself. In the redundance of
books since the invention of printing, it were better that a thousand
innocent ones should suffer than that one guilty should escape. Neither
should reasons be given which would provoke opposition and would impair
the dignity of laws that ought to rest simply upon their own authority.
Correction and expurgation were likewise deemed inexpedient as tending
to invite criticism and to make enemies. A contrary opinion, however,
prevailed and at the eighteenth session, a decree was passed declaring
that as the disease of pernicious books had not yielded to the salutary
medicine hitherto applied, it was deemed proper that certain Fathers
should be appointed diligently to examine and to state to the council
what was necessary to be done respecting the censure of books. In its
last session, the council referred to the judgment of the pope the work
that had been prepared by its committee, and publication of the same
was made in Rome in 1564.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account