The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
The Lisbon Index of 1624 not only confirmed the prohibition of Bibles
and parts of the Bible, but added a new restriction in forbidding the
use in works of general literature (printed in the vernacular) of any
extracts from the Scriptures. This order called for the cancellation,
for instance, in the _Shepherds of Bethlehem_ of Lope de Vega, of
the poet’s versions of the _Magnificat_, the _Benedictus_, the _Nunc
Dimittis_, and the _Miserere_. In Italy, previous to 1560, a number
of translations of the Scriptures had been issued, but after the
prohibitions of Paul IV and of the Index of Trent, we find record of
Italian versions only of the Psalms and a few other portions, and these
could be read only with a formal permission. In 1596, Clement VIII
authorised the publication, by the Order of Jesus, of an edition in
the vernacular of the portions of the Gospels selected for reading on
Sundays and Saints’ days. It would appear, however, as if north of the
Alps, this proscription of the Scriptures in the vernacular failed to
secure any general enforcement, as during the 16th and 17th centuries
a large series of editions of the Scriptures and of the New Testament
were brought into print from Catholic translations, in French, German,
Bohemian, Hungarian, and Polish. The Jesuit Serarius, writing in 1612,
complains that “any one in Germany can read the Bibles of Eck or
Dietenberger, and in place of being reprimanded and punished by their
bishops and confessors, the delinquents are likely to be commended and
honoured.”
V. Sixtus orders further that the name of the heretical publisher
of the work must be cancelled and that of the “Expurgator” must be
specified. Benedict directs that dictionaries, thesauri, and similar
works compiled by heretics, “like the publications of the Stephani,
Scapula, J. J. Hofmann, etc.,” must, before being “permitted,” be
thoroughly “expurgated” of all material which may be antagonistic to
the Catholic faith.
VI. Sixtus directs that books written in the vernacular which combat
the doctrines of the Jews and Mohammedans, shall be read only under
authorisation of the Inquisition. In Germany, the prohibition against
the reading of controversial books printed in the vernacular secured
very little obedience and such books came, during the 16th century,
into very wide circulation.
VII. In the Index of Paul, there is recorded under this heading a
group of Priapean literature connected (erroneously) with the name of
Virgil. The only other classic author condemned as obscene is Lucian.
In the Lisbon Index of 1624, it is specified that the Epigrams of
Martial can be permitted only after expurgation, or in the text edited
by the Jesuits Fusius, Radius, and Augerius. Ovid’s erotic poems are
permitted “for private reading,” but for students only the _Epistolae
Selectae_ as edited at Tournay, 1615. Sixtus prohibits also obscene
pictures and collections of music containing amatory songs.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account