The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
In Classes II and III, Clement has omitted (in the list as finally
revised) a number of astrological works which had been included by
Sixtus, a series of Italian poets and novelists, and a group of Spanish
titles taken from Quiroga. The few additions to Class II contain few
names of present note. Franciscus Patritius Nova, who held the chair of
philosophy at Ferrara, had in his lectures on the philosophy of Plato
given to Bellarmin and others ground for criticism. Franciscus had, in
a letter to Gregory XIV, strongly recommended that the philosophical
teachings of Aristotle should be excluded from all the schools of
Christendom, and that the Church should give its approval to the
doctrines of Plato (as interpreted in his own lectures).
The _Apologia_ of Davila, printed in Madrid in 1591, is the first
work of the Spanish Regalists (defenders of the authority of the State)
to find place in the Roman Index. Through the 17th century, the list of
the Spanish treatises of this school condemned by the Roman authorities
is a long one.
In Class III, have been added a number of treatises from the Low
Countries, from Germany, and from France, bearing on the relations
of Church and State. The list includes a _Gratulatio_ from
Switzerland to France for the accession of the most Christian King of
France and of Navarre, Henry IV.
The “Instruction” of Clement, which is included as an appendix to the
Rules of Trent, includes the following provisions:
[Sidenote: (I) Concerning the Prohibition of Books]
(1) All bishops and inquisitors are instructed to give orders that,
under heavy penalties for disobedience, their people must within a
limited period make delivery of all copies of the books condemned.
(2) The bishops and inquisitors (in Rome the _Magister S. Palatii_)
are authorised to give permission to men of assured holiness and
scholarship to retain, for a period not exceeding three years,
copies of the forbidden books. They bind themselves to report to the
authorities, in the books which are permitted _donec corrigatur_, such
passages as they may find to be heretical.
(3) Outside of Italy, the responsibility for the distribution of the
lists of heretical and immoral books rests with the bishops, the
inquisitors, and the universities. The instructions to the people in
regard to the reading or possession of such books are to be given
by the bishops and inquisitors. This instruction was for a time
interpreted as an authority given by the pope for the preparation of
local Indexes. In 1621, however, the Index Congregation issued an order
prohibiting the further production of any such local lists, or the
further circulation of the lists already in print.
(4) The nuncios and legates in foreign lands, and in Italy the bishops
and inquisitors, are to submit annually to the Curia or to the
Index Congregation lists of the books published in their respective
territories, which in their judgment call for expurgation or are
deserving of condemnation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account