The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
The edict of 1782, a citation of which appears in the Index of
1790, orders that: All persons having permission for the reading of
prohibited books must, not less often than once a year, make statement
to the confessors of the books of this class that they are utilising.
The confessors are authorised and instructed by the Inquisition to
revoke these permits in case they find that the reading in question
is causing injury to the faith of those holding the permits. The
confessors are to demand of the penitents from time to time, and in any
case at the time of the annual confession, whether they have in their
possession copies of prohibited books and whether in the course of the
year they have read any such books. In the former case, the penitents
must agree to deliver the books for destruction; and in the latter must
truly express their penitence for the sin committed. Until this has
been done, they are not to receive absolution.
The permits for the reading of prohibited books given by the Roman
Congregations are not valid in Spain. The permits issued directly by
the pope are to be delivered to the inquisitor-general in Spain or
to the council of the Inquisition, who are, if they are willing to
confirm them, to make registration of the same. They may, however,
refuse to confirm such Roman permits on the ground that the results
would be injurious for those using them. The permission to read
prohibited books or to possess copies of them, does not carry with it
the authority to import such books, to buy or to sell copies, to make
presentation of copies, or to exchange them for other books.
Among the noteworthy books contained in the supplement to the
Spanish Index, issued in 1805, may be mentioned the following:
Bonnet, _Oeuvres_, 18 volumes; the works of Alexander Pope, Laurence
Sterne (the reference is to the French version), Forster, _Voyage
Philosophique_; Smith, the _Wealth of Nations_ (French version); Burke,
_Reflections on the French Revolution_; _Die Rechte des Menschen_, a
reply to Burke’s treatise on the Revolution, etc.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account