In this same Appendix _Unica_ appears for the first time in an Index the name of Fénelon, Archbishop of Cambray. The work condemned is _Explications des Maximes des Saints_. The particular offence in the volume is understood by Mendham to have been the acceptance by Fénelon of the views of the mystical Spanish nun, Sor d’Agreda. There were evidently, however, some other matters in Fénelon’s volume which were found to be dangerous, as the Pope, Innocent XII, found occasion to issue in regard to it a special _Constitution_ in which were condemned twenty-three propositions extracted from Fénelon’s _Explications_. The perusal of the work was forbidden, under pain of excommunication, to all the faithful without exception. The _Constitution_ bears date, March 12, 1699. In the same year, there was issued at Paris an _Arrêt de la Cour de Parlement_ enregistering the letters patent of the king for the execution of this _Constitution_. The Archbishop appears to have accepted without protest the condemnation of the Pope and the authority of the High Court of Parliament. _1704._ _Rome._ _Index Prohibitorius._--_Index Librorum Prohibitorum Innoc. XII. P.M. jussu. editus. Usque ad Annum 1681. Eidem accedit in fine Appendix usque ad mensem Junii._ _1711._ _Rome Index: Prohibitorius._ This Index, issued under the authority of Clement XI, has no prefatory matter and simply extends up to the date of 1710 the lists of the next preceding Roman Index. _1744._ _Rome. Index Prohibitorius._ This Index is characterised as distinctive in the absence of all the customary prefatory articles excepting the _Regulae_. Among the works prohibited is a treatise of the Jesuit Benzi, which had some importance in the controversies of the period. _1750._ _Rome._ _Index Prohibitorius._--This is a reprint of the above with additions to 1750.