The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
In 1515, Erasmus took time from his literary work to interest himself
in behalf of his friend, the learned and high-minded Reuchlin, the
greatest Hebrew scholar of the day. Reuchlin had fallen under the
persecution of the Dominicans, led by the ignorant and bigoted
Hoogstraaten, for his opposition to the diabolical proposal to destroy
all existing Hebrew literature, the Scriptures alone excepted. He had
defended himself in a book entitled the _Speculum Oculare_ (the
Eyeglass), and on a mandate being issued by Hoogstraaten to burn this,
Reuchlin had appealed from the Inquisition to the pope. The Bishop of
Speyer, to whom Leo committed the case, gave judgment in favour of
Reuchlin and imposed on his enemies perpetual silence, a sentence
which proved difficult of execution. Reuchlin was condemned by the
universities of Mayence, Erfurt, Louvain, and Paris, although there
were at the time professorships of Hebrew both in Louvain and in Paris.
The matter was in some fashion again brought before the pope, to whom
an earnest and eloquent appeal was made by Erasmus on behalf of his
friend. The support of the Emperor Maximilian was also secured for
the aged scholar who had done so much to bring honour to the cause
of learning in Germany and in Europe. The pope finally confirmed the
previous decision in favour of Reuchlin, a decision which rescued from
the status of heresy, in which it had been placed by the Dominicans and
the learned faculties of the universities, the language of the Hebrew
Scriptures and the literature of the chosen people of God. Reuchlin’s
books were rescued from the ban and their learned author was saved from
the risk of the stake.[221]
The _Colloquies_ of Erasmus were published in 1518, and were reprinted
in a long series of editions authorised and unauthorised. One printer
in Paris, learning that the university was about to condemn the work,
brought into circulation no less than twenty thousand copies.[222] This
constitutes a curious example of the influence that could be exerted by
an official condemnation in bringing about for the work an immediate
and extended demand for a book. The writings of Erasmus were condemned
_in toto_, in 1550, in the Spanish Index of that date.
In 1539, the interest of Francis in scholarship, and the influence
of Budaeus caused him to invite Erasmus to Paris to take part in the
organisation of a royal college. The Emperor (Charles V) put an end
to the negotiation by forbidding Erasmus (under the penalty of the
stoppage of his pension) to leave the territory of the empire. It is
interesting to think of the most Catholic Emperor on the one hand,
and the “eldest son of the Church” on the other, contending for the
services of the scholar whose writings had been condemned in Rome as
heretical and were prohibited in Spain, and who could not at this time
obtain from the Paris University a printing-privilege.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account