The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
=2. Luther.=--It is with the work of Luther that there begins to be a
large production and a wide distribution of books in German. Up to this
time the undertakings of the German printers had been restricted almost
exclusively to books in Latin. The immediate distribution, however, of
the writings of Luther and his associates, not only among the trade
folk and working people of the towns, but through the rural districts,
constitutes an evidence that the general intelligence and the education
of the mass of the people had reached a much higher development than
the Protestant historians of the time have been willing to admit. It is
to be remembered that the readers whom Luther was reaching belonged to
the generation which had depended for its education exclusively upon
the monastery schools, or upon schools which were entirely under the
direction of the priests. The work of the reformers was essentially a
work of argument, and it could have been carried on successfully only
with people who were intelligent enough to understand arguments whether
presented orally or in print. That the community was as intelligent
and as receptive as proved to be the case, shows how exaggerated and
ill-considered are the conclusions presented by Protestant historians
represented by D’Aubigné, Robertson, and others in regard to the
absolute ignorance in which the Catholic teachers had left their
followers. Kapp reports that of Luther’s treatise on German theology
no less than seventy editions were printed between the years 1518 and
1854. Of the _Address to the German Nobility_, four thousand copies
were sold in five days. Of the first edition of the New Testament,
printed in Wittenberg in 1522, five thousand copies were sold within
three months. There seems to have been no question that the emphasis
given by the imperial and ecclesiastical censorship to the importance
of Luther’s writings constituted an important factor in bringing these
to the attention of the public, and in securing for them the largest
possible circulation.
Luther realised that, with hardly an exception, the scholarly divines
of the university were antagonistic to him and to his work. He writes
February 8, 1516: _Nec cessant universitates bonos libros cremare et
damnare, rursum malos dictare, imo somniare_.[224]
In 1519, the doctors of Louvain published an edict ordering the
burning of all copies that could be secured of the writings of Luther.
A similar order was issued in 1520 by the divines of Cologne. Both
orders were printed in Wittenberg, in 1520, by Melchior Lottherus.
In 1521, the theological faculty of Paris issued an edict entitled
_Determinationes Theologicae Facultatis Parisien. super Doctrina
Lutheriana_. The edict, which was printed in Wittenberg in the
same year, condemns a number of propositions from the treatise _De
Captivitate Babylonica_. The theological facility of Cologne issued,
in 1532, a censure against the _Epitome of Abuses by a Reformed
Monk_.[225]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account