The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 1 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
Apart from the general injunction in this “Constitution,” it contains
a specific prohibition of the treatise on Monarchy by Antonio Roselli,
and of the theses of Pico della Mirandola. Those who have printed
or who may hereafter print these works, or who may have bought or
come into the possession of copies, are ordered, under penalty of
excommunication, to deliver such copies at once for destruction.
Roselli was professor of law in Siena and later in Padua. His treatise
_De Monarchia_ had been printed in Venice in 1483 and in 1487. His
name stands in all the Roman Indexes except in that of Trent, and
thereafter with the proviso _donec corrigatur_. Pico escaped official
classification as a heretic and no one of his writings finds place in
the Index. In 1487, he had brought before the public no less than nine
hundred theses which he was prepared to defend against all critics. The
pope ordered an examination to be made of these theses (propositions)
by a commission of theologians and jurists. The commission found
that thirteen of the theses were tainted with heresy. Pico, while
maintaining the orthodoxy of his propositions, expressed his readiness
to submit himself to the judgment of the pope. Six years later, he was
able to secure from Alexander VI a further examination, conducted by
three cardinals and the _Magister Palatii_, and on the report of this
commission, the pope declared Pico to be free from suspicion of heresy.
_1501._ _Alexander VI_, in a Bull entitled _Inter Multiplices_,
addressed to the Archbishop of Magdeburg and to the rulers of the
three ecclesiastical principalities, says: “The art of printing can
be of great service in so far as it furthers the circulation of
useful and tested books; but it can bring about serious evils if it
is permitted to widen the influence of pernicious works. It will,
therefore, be necessary to maintain full control over the printers
so that they may be prevented from bringing into print writings
which are antagonistic to the Catholic faith, or which are likely to
cause trouble to believers.” The Bull proceeds to state that in the
dioceses of Cologne, Mayence, Treves, and Magdeburg many books and
tracts are being sent out from the presses which contain pernicious
errors, wrong doctrine, and heresies; and prohibits, under pain of
the excommunication _latae sententiae_, any further printing of such
books, and also the possession or perusal of the same. The bishops
and inquisitors are charged with the execution of the decree; and
are ordered to enforce its provisions against all persons, whatever
their rank or positions, and also against colleges, universities, and
associations, with the threat that, in case of opposition or evasion,
the penalties shall be sharpened and multiplied. The civil powers are
to be invoked if necessary, and in order to strengthen the interest
of the local authorities, they are to receive one half the amounts of
the penalties collected in money.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account