The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
=18. Controversies concerning the Chinese and Malabar Usages.=--Under
Clement XI, was decided, adversely to the contentions of the Jesuits,
through a decree of the Inquisition in 1710 and a Bull of 1715,
an issue that had continued during a series of years between the
missionaries of the Jesuits and those of the rival Orders, concerning
the propriety of permitting the Chinese converts to retain certain
special usages. The Inquisition prohibited the publication, unless
with the special authorisation of the pope, of all writings which were
concerned with these Chinese usages or with the controversies that had
arisen concerning them. This prohibition was entered by Benedict XIV
in the _Decreta Gen._, iv, 6, and, in 1722, the division of the great
history of the Jesuits by Juvencius, which treated of this matter,
was condemned separately. This action aroused fresh controversies
and, in 1742, Benedict found occasion for a further Bull devoted to
them. In 1744, another Bull was issued, in which decision was given in
an analogous issue that had arisen with the Malabars; and, in 1745,
Benedict caused the Inquisition to prohibit, on the ground of some
antagonistic opinions expressed in it in regard to this decision, a
comprehensive history by the Capucin Norbert. The two controversies
continued during a long term of years and produced a mass of
controversial publications, but few separate titles of these writings
came into the Index; the See appears to have considered the general
prohibitions above specified sufficient to meet the requirements.
=19. Fraudulent Literature.=--In the _Decreta Gen._, ii, 10,
are prohibited all books, pamphlets, criticisms, and commentaries,
whether written or printed, which had to do with certain lead tablets
(_Laminae plumbeae_) which had been dug up in Granada and which
bore ancient Arabic characters; with these were condemned certain
manuscripts which had been unearthed in the foundations of an old
tower in Granada. The condemnation covers also works not devoted to
this subject-matter but in which references are made to said tablets
or writings, until and unless such references have been eliminated.
The fragments of tablets and of manuscripts, which, according to their
text, had been inscribed in the time of the Apostles, were discovered
between the years 1588 and 1597; but it was not until 1682 that they
were officially pronounced by the authorities in Rome to be fraudulent.
The false monographs of Flavius Lucius Dexter which belonged to the
same group of manufactured documents, were never forbidden either in
Rome or in Spain. Of the long series of treatises written concerning
the letter said to have been addressed by the Madonna to the residents
of Messina, two only have come into the Index.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account