The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
=21. Fénelon.=--In 1697, Fénelon, who had with Bossuet interested
himself some years earlier in the protection of Madame Guyon, published
his volume on the Saints and the Inner Life. The doctrines therein
presented on contemplation as distinguished from meditation, and in
regard to the pure and unselfish love of God, which, as he contended,
caused to be put to one side selfishness and the demand for individual
salvation, were sharply criticised by Bossuet and other of his fellow
bishops. The volume was by Fénelon himself forwarded to Rome for a
decision as to its orthodoxy. Louis XIV demanded from Innocent XII, in
July, 1697, the condemnation of the book. It was placed for examination
in the hands of the censorship committee of the Inquisition. The
reports of the representatives who had been sent to Rome in regard
to the business, represented that the votes of the Inquisitors would
have decided in favour of Fénelon’s treatise if it had not been for
the requirement of Louis XIV. In a brief of March, 1699, the book was
prohibited under the penalty of excommunication, and twenty-three
propositions cited from it were specifically censured. In this brief,
pains had been taken to avoid the use of any expressions which would
be likely to cause annoyance in France and in fact no reference was
made in it to the Inquisition. The brief was confirmed by the French
Church and was formally published, and Fénelon submitted himself to the
judgment. The earlier prohibition of the writings of Lacombe and Madame
Guyon (the opinions in which were substantially at one with those
presented by Fénelon) appears hardly to have become known in France,
where it certainly never was acted upon. Fénelon’s correspondence from
Rome states that the influence of the Jesuits there had been exercised
in his favour. The Jesuits were, at the moment, in connection with some
conditions in China, in opposition to the Pope and were willing on
this ground to support the contentions even of a Jansenist. Chanterac,
who was Fénelon’s representative in Rome, suggested to the bishop
that ground could be found for denouncing before the Inquisition the
writings of his opponent Bossuet, but Fénelon appears to have been
unwilling to have any such matter brought into question in connection
with the pending issue. The brief of the Pope was published in France
under the direct authority of the King by means of letters patent. The
Maxims of Fénelon (in which had been found the larger number of the
propositions condemned) were never placed in the Spanish Index. An
edition of the _Télémaque_ which had been printed in London was,
however, under an edict of 1771, expurgated before being authorised for
circulation in Spain.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account