The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
Hilgers refers to the name of Mirabeau which stands on the Roman
Index connected with the godless and immoral essay on the Bible that
was printed anonymously, but the authorship of which was identified.
He points out that this same book, when later reprinted in Paris, was
condemned in 1829, and again in 1868, and on these two occasions not by
Rome, but by the censorship of the State.
Among the books which secured the distinction of condemnation by the
civil authorities, may be cited the following:
d’Aubigné, Sieur, _Histoire Universelle_. This book was condemned
and burned in 1667 immediately after its publication, under a decree
of the Parliament and a sentence of the Provost of Paris. The ground
for the condemnation was certain satirical references contained in the
history concerning Charles IX, Henry III, and Henry IV.
Beaumarchais, Pierre Augustin Caron de, _Mémoire_. The book was
condemned and ordered to be burned by the public hangman under a
decree of the Parliament of Paris, February, 1774. It was described as
containing scandalous charges against the magistracy and the members of
the Parliament.[69]
To France had been accorded, since the time of Pepin, the title of
“eldest son of the Church.” It is France, however (or perhaps one
should say consequently), that has found occasion to repudiate or to
annul the greatest number of papal Bulls. I cite as follows certain of
the more noteworthy of these acts of protest or of rebellion against
the authority of Rome.
_Papal Bulls Repudiated in France._--1300. Boniface VIII. A Bull
was issued by the Pope against Philip the Fair in connection with
the injunction imposed by the Pope upon the King to make a pilgrimage
to the Holy Land, and more immediately as a result of the treatment
accorded by Philip to the papal emissary, who had been imprisoned for
threatening interdict against the King. The Bull of excommunication
was replied to with a decree from the King headed: _Philippe, par le
grâce de Dieu roi des Français, à Boniface prétendu pape, peu ou point
de salut_.
1407. Benedict XIII (classed as an anti-pope). In this Bull the Pope
excommunicates all those who undertake to prevent the peaceable
settlement for which he was working and who opposed themselves to his
designs as the University of Paris had already done. The Pope places
under interdict the kingdom of France and the domains of the empire.
Charles II, the Parliament, the clergy, and the University of Paris
issued in general council a decree stating that Benedict was not only a
schismatic but a heretic.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account