The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
In 1794, the _Allgemeine deutsche Bibliothek_ is prohibited in
Prussian dominions as constituting an influence against the Christian
religion. This is an example of a long series of similar prohibitions.
In 1816, the _Rheinische Merkür_ of the poet Görres, who had done
so much to arouse public opinion against Napoleon, was suppressed under
a Cabinet order. The royal censorship was ameliorated under Frederick
William but was again strengthened in 1848 and during the years
immediately succeeding.
In 1844–5 was published at Jena a catalogue entitled _Index Librorum
Prohibitorum_, giving the titles only of books prohibited in Germany.
In 1882, was published in Berlin what is probably the latest of the
State Indexes. It is devoted to a list of works maintaining the
principles of the Social Democrats, which works had been condemned and
prohibited under the authority of an act of the Reichsrath of 1878. The
list includes several hundred publications, chiefly pamphlets.
The political censorship existing to-day throughout Prussia and the
German Empire under the imperial control is of course familiar to all
readers of the 20th century. Between 1878 and the close of the century,
a very long list of Social Democratic writings, pamphlets, books, and
journals came under condemnation and suppression. This policy was
continued into the 20th century, although under present conditions its
thorough enforcement is a matter of increasing difficulty.
Hilgers points out that the instances of Protestant political
censorship against works which are purely literary or intellectual
in their character, that is to say, which had no direct concern with
either religion or politics, are far more numerous than under the
action of the censorship authorities of Rome. Among other examples, he
points out the action of Luther against the works of Erasmus and the
writings of a number of the Humanists; the decree of the Duke of Weimar
(acting at the initiative of Goethe) against _Isis_, and for the
suppression of the epoch-making writings of the philosopher Fichte; the
acts of Frederick the Great against Voltaire, and the measures taken by
Bismarck against a long series of writings that came into print during
the _Kulturkampf_.
An order issued in January, 1903, by the rector of the University of
Berlin, prohibits the delivery of a lecture on Proudhon and Lasalle
on the ground that it was necessary to take “all possible precautions
for the protection of young souls from the pernicious and poisonous
influence of sociological errors.”[82]
In November, 1902, in a convention held at Hamburg of the teachers
of Germany, it was proposed to prohibit the use in schools of the
catechism of Luther and of the Protestant Scriptures.[83]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account