The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
Grotius suffered much more severely from the persecution of his
fellow-historians than from any action on the part of censors of the
Roman Church. His friend Olden-Barneveld had lost his life largely
because of differences on theological matters with certain of his
fellow-Calvinists. The same fate would probably have befallen Grotius
if he had not succeeded in escaping from prison.
Hobbes, when instructor in the University of Cambridge, having
undertaken to defend certain propositions concerning the law of
nature, was prohibited from further teaching and was driven from
the university. He betook himself to Amsterdam, but even here, the
_Leviathan_, (printed in London, in 1651,) came under condemnation. The
Roman censors are criticised (and with justice) for their prohibition
of the writings of Spinoza, but the condemnation of Spinoza was much
more severe among his own people than anything that had been proposed
by the authorities of Rome. The ban uttered in the Jewish temple on the
27th of July, 1656, closes with the words:
“We order hereafter that no one shall have communication with
Baruch Espinoza either by word of mouth or in writing, that no
one shall render him any service, that no one shall remain under
the same roof with or even accost him, that no one shall in any
manner have communication with him.”
The works of Spinoza and the _Leviathan_ of Hobbes were brought
under a series of condemnations under the authority of the Prince of
Orange, the States of Holland, the synods of the Church, the local
magistrates, the university authorities, and the Burgomaster of Leyden.
In 1668, Adrian Coerbach, a doctor of medicine of Amsterdam, was
charged with having accepted the opinions of Spinoza and with having
defended these before others. He gave evidence that he had never spoken
with Spinoza and had not spoken publicly of his theories. He was,
however, sentenced to be imprisoned for ten years and thereafter to
be banished from Holland for ten years. In 1678, the Synod of South
Holland, in session at Leyden, gave fresh judgment concerning the
pernicious writings of Spinoza. Between the years 1650–1680, there
were in all no less than fifty similar edicts or judgments, in some
instances accompanied by severe punishments, against the reading or
circulation of the works of Spinoza. In many cases, under the same
judgment was placed the _Leviathan_ of Hobbes.
[Sidenote: Scandinavia]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account