The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
In 1594, Adfield and Carter suffered death
because the former had brought into England a Catholic book and the
latter had had the same in his possession.
A sect that fell under the displeasure of Queen Elizabeth was the
“Family of Love.” The founder was a Dutch Anabaptist, born at Delft,
called David George, but the leader whose influence was of the most
importance was Henry Nicolai of Münster. Nicolai gave out that his
writings were of equal authority with Holy Scripture. “Moses,” he says,
“taught mankind to hope, Christ to believe, but Nicolai taught man to
love, which last is of more worth than both the former.” The Queen
ordered (in 1575) that all books and writings maintaining this doctrine
should be destroyed and burned and that possessors of such books should
be duly punished. In 1608, James I, in a proclamation concerning the
supervision of literature, says: “For better oversight of books of all
sortes before they come to the presse, we have resolved to make choice
of commissioners that shall looke more narrowly into the nature of all
those things that shall be put to the presse, either concerning our
authoritie royall or concerning our government, or the lawes of our
Kingdom.”[84]
In July, 1637, the Star Chamber published an act for the regulation of
literature which in the severity of its censorship can be compared only
with a procedure under Napoleon. It was prohibited to import or make
sale of any books the influence of which was opposed to sound faith or
to the authority of the Church or to the authority of government or
to any rulers or to the interests of the community, or in which there
should be libels or attacks against any corporation or any individual
person. The penalties prescribed included fines, imprisonment, and
bodily punishment, the decision to be made under the authority of the
Chamber. The printing of any book which had not secured the approval
of the Chamber was forbidden under heavy penalties. Books in the
department of jurisprudence must be approved by the Chief Justice or by
some authority appointed by him; books on history and statecraft were
to be approved by the Secretary of State; those on morals by the Lord
Marshal; works on theology, philosophy, natural science, poetry, and
general literature, by the Archbishop of Canterbury or Bishop of London
or by the chancellor of one of the two universities. Licenses were to
be issued for but twenty master printers outside of those appointed
directly by the Crown and those allotted to the universities. No
printer was to operate more than two presses or was to have more than
two apprentices. Should anybody undertake to operate a press without
securing a license from the Chamber, he was liable to be placed in the
stocks, to be flogged through the city, and, after judgment, to further
penalties.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account