The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
The jurist Scheurl writes from Nuremberg to Cardinal Campeggi, March
15, 1524: “Every common man is now asking for books or pamphlets and
more reading is being done in a day than heretofore in a year.”[95]
In Nuremberg, as in other towns, it became the practice to read the
books of Luther out loud in the market place. Erasmus complains, in
1523, that since the publication of the German New Testament, the whole
book-trade seems to be absorbed with the writings of Luther, and to
be interested in giving attention to nothing else. He says, further,
that it is very difficult to find in Germany publishers willing to
place their imprint upon books written in behalf of the Papacy. As
an example of the kind of interest caused by the writings of Luther,
it is recorded that the magistrates of Bremen sent a bookseller to
Wittenberg for the purpose of purchasing for their official use a set
of Luther’s works. The citizens of Speyer are described as having the
books read to them at supper, and as making transcripts of the texts.
In hundreds of towns throughout Germany, Luther’s writings were brought
to the notice of the people by means of the very edict which had for
its purpose their final suppression, and after the Diet of Worms, the
demand for them rapidly increased. The preacher Matthaeus Zell writes
from Strasburg, in 1523: “The Lutheran books are for sale here in the
market-place immediately beneath the edicts of the emperor and of the
pope declaring them to be prohibited.”
With the beginning of the 13th century, it was realised that the newly
organised universities had become the centres of intellectual activity.
The popes undertook promptly the institution of machinery for the
supervision of the work done in the universities and of the literary
productions that came from the instructors. It was the contention of
the papal representatives that the appointments of the university
officials having to do directly with the work of multiplying books,
must rest with the theological faculty, that is to say with the
immediate representatives of the Church. This contention was, in the
main, sustained in such university centres as Bologna, Paris, Prague,
Vienna, and Cologne. A brief, issued in 1479 by Sixtus IV, charges
the rectors and the deacons of the university with the responsibility
of censorship. The edict in 1486 by Berthold, Archbishop of Mayence,
is to be classed not as an ecclesiastical act but as an expression
of authority of a German prince. The Archbishop asserted the right
on behalf not of the Roman Church but of his State. The censorship
exercised by the University of Cologne terminated with the close of the
15th century. The representative of the Archbishop claimed authority,
on the strength of the Bull issued in 1486 by Innocent VIII, directed
against the printers of pernicious books, to take into his own hands
the direction of censorship of the entire principality.
[Sidenote: Early Printers and the Church]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account