The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
The destruction of books classed as pernicious appears to have been,
during the 15th century, within the province of any person of position
and influence.[106] In 1490, Torquemada burned, under order of
Ferdinand and Isabella, a number of Hebrew Bibles, and, later, he made
at Salamanca an _auto-da-fé_ of more than six thousand volumes
described as books of magic or as infected with Jewish errors. Ximenes,
while yet merely Archbishop, burned in the public square of Granada
no less than five thousand Arabic books, many of them splendidly
ornamented and illuminated. The only books spared from the collection
were those on the subject of medicine, which were deposited in the
University of Alcala.[107] In 1502, Ferdinand and Isabella enacted
an elaborate law, which is referred to as the first of the kind in
Europe, establishing a general censorship of the press. In this law,
were laid down the principles on which were based nearly all subsequent
enactments. To Spain thus belongs the honour of organising the system
which was to exercise an influence so incomputable on the development
of human intelligence.
“The Spanish people strove earnestly for the maintenance of the faith
but it understood by this not the reform of methods of life and the
correction of immorality, but the extirpation of heresy.”[108]
“The uncompromising character of the Spanish temperament, which pursued
its object regardless of consequences, saw at once what was elsewhere
only perceived by degrees, that any endeavours to set bounds to the
multiplying products of the press could be successful only under a
thorough system of minute surveillance.”[109] It was ordered that
no book should be printed or imported or exposed for sale without
examination and license. In some places, this duty was imposed upon
judges of the royal courts and in others on the archbishops or bishops.
The examiners, men of good repute and learning, were to be appointed
by these authorities and were to be adequately paid for their work.
After a work in manuscript had been licensed for printing, the printed
sheets were to be carefully compared with the original to insure that
no alteration had been made on the press. Any book printed or imported
or offered for sale without such license was to be seized and burned
and the printer or vendor was declared incapable of longer carrying on
the business.[110] In this first enactment, no reference is made to
the Inquisition as having any concern either with the investigation
of books for heresies or with the punishment of delinquents; but
the Inquisition had not long to wait before its jurisdiction over
literature was established on an impregnable basis.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account