SUE, E. _Omnes fabulae amatoriae._ 1852. SWEDENBORG, E. _Principia verum naturalium_, etc. 1738. TAINE, H. A. _Histoire de la littérature anglaise._ 1866. _Testament, le nouveau_ (printed at Mons), 1668, [together with three other editions in French, one in Dutch, and three in Italian, 1709–1820]. THOMAS KEMPISIUS. _De imitando Christo._ 1723. TILLOTSON, JEAN. _Sermons, traduits de l’anglois._ 1725. VOLNEY, C. F. _Les ruines, etc., des empires._ 1821. VOLTAIRE, F. M. A. _Oeuvres._ 1752. This entry is followed by thirty-eight separate titles of the books of Voltaire which called for special condemnation. WHATELY, R. _Elements of Logic._ 1851. WHITE, THOMAS. _Opera omnia._ 1655–1663. WILKINS, J. _Discovery of a New World._ 1701. ZOLA, É. _Opera omnia._ 1894–1898. ZWICHER, G. _Monks and their Doctrine._ 1898. =2. Index Revision and Reform, 1868–1880.=--Pomponio Leto reports[159] that Pope Pius IX had instituted, in addition to the six existing commissions of the council, a seventh commission placed under the direction of Cardinal de Luca, which was to be charged with the consideration of biblical material and of the revision of the Index. It appears, however, that this commission held but one or two sessions in 1868 and after 1869 was not again called together. From time to time suggestions have been submitted for the reform of Index proceedings. In 1870, eleven French bishops took the ground that no work by a Catholic writer should be condemned by the Congregation unless and until the author had had an opportunity of being heard in its defence and of replying to criticisms of any special passages. It seemed to these bishops outrageous that, possibly on the ground of the lack of correct understanding of certain individual passages, important books, representing the serious labour of devout scholars, should be placed under the same class of condemnation as that applied to godless and heretical writings or to books _contra bonos mores_.[160] The bishops of Germany joined in the demand for a reshaping of the rules of the Index for which in a number of territories it had not been practicable to secure obedience. They also demanded that in the future no book by a Catholic writer should be condemned until a hearing had been given by the bishops to its author. It was contended that by means of such direct action the injury of an official censorship would in a large number of cases be avoided. In a number of monographs printed in 1869 and 1870, the contention was maintained that there should be either a discontinuance of the operations of the Congregation of the Index or a thoroughgoing reform in the whole method of Church censorship.[161]