The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
The Leonine Index repeats but two prohibitions back of the date of
1600. The first, bearing date 1575, makes entry of the title of the
_Chronicon_ of Conrad of Lichtenau, and the second, under the
date of 1580, the title of _Il Salmista secondo la Bibbia_, etc.
During the above specified period, covering three centuries, the lists
comprise some four thousand titles, but this number includes a hundred
and eight authors whose entire writings (under the entry of _Opera
omnia_) came under condemnation. If the works of these writers were
added separately to the schedule, the titles would aggregate about
five thousand. Of these titles, some fifteen hundred belong to the
17th century, twelve hundred to the 18th, and thirteen hundred to the
19th; while from the publications of the last decade of the 19th have
been selected but one hundred and thirty-one titles. This last group
includes, however, the _Opera omnia_ of Zola. The writers of the
19th century who have been distinguished through the condemnation of
their entire works comprise the following: Sue, 1852; Dumas (father
and son), 1863; Sand (Dudévant), 1863; Balzac, 1864; Champfleury
(Fleury-Husson), 1864; Feydeau, 1864; Murger, 1864; Soulié, 1864; Hume
(David), 1827; Morado, 1821; Plancy, 1827; Proudhon, 1852; Spaventa,
1856; Vira, 1876; Ferrari, 1879; Zola, 1895.
The omission from the Leonine Index of a long list of names, which
appeared in earlier Indexes connected with the term _Opera omnia_,
is to be understood as giving permission to the faithful for the
use of such books of these writers as do not appear under specific
condemnation or as cannot at once be classed under the general
prohibitions. All of the books of writers of this first class which
do not antagonise either the true Faith or good morality are now free
for Catholic readers. This exception would of course continue to rule
out the writings of the leaders of the original Reformation, Luther,
Calvin, Melanchthon, and the rest, although the names of these writers
do not find place in the Leonine lists. The Index of Benedict (who
from the liberal character of his convictions and policy was sometimes
spoken of as the free-thinking Pope) strengthened the prohibitions
against some fifty authors. The names of these authors, which had
previously been connected only with specific books, are entered in the
Index of 1758 with _Opera omnia_. Hilgers emphasises the greater
liberality of Leo XIII in recalling these authors from the _Opera
omnia_ classification and in leaving condemned only certain specific
works. He gives as another example of the liberality of Leo the freeing
from condemnation of the famous treatise by Grotius, _De Jure Belli
ac Pacis_. This had previously been condemned with a _d.c._ but
the objectionable portions had never been specified and no corrected
edition had ever been attempted. Another work of this class, previously
condemned but now left free by Leo, is the _Paradise Lost_ of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account