The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
“The faithful throughout the world are under obligations
to accept the authority of the censorship tribunals, the
Inquisition and the Congregation of the Index, not only in
regard to the prohibition of the use of prohibited books but
also with reference to the conclusions reached by these censors
concerning the soundness of doctrine or general fitness for
devout reading of the literature contained in such books....
The history of the Church has secured for the wisdom of the
work of the censorship authorities an assured, even a brilliant
confirmation.” “The only utterance,” continues this writer,
“in which the Congregation of the Index can be convicted of a
serious or decisive error of judgment is that of the decree
issued in 1616 against the writings of Copernicus.... While the
history makes clear (what in fact no one has ever denied) that
the Roman Congregations are in their judgments not infallible,
the evidence is overwhelming as to the wisdom and effectiveness
with which the work of these scholarly and devout censors has
been carried on through the centuries; and it would be an act
of very gross presumption for individual believers to undertake
to question the validity and substantial value of their
conclusions.”
In 1865, an article in the official _Civiltà Cattolica_[170] in
regard to a treatise of the Bishop of Treviso, says:
“The infallibility of a prohibition or condemnation of a book
which has been expressed through a papal Bull, a papal brief,
or under a decree of the Congregation which has been issued
under specific instructions from the pope, cannot be questioned.
The ordinary decrees of the Congregation cannot be said to
possess the same full measure of infallibility as these rest
not upon the direct authority of the pope but merely upon
the general authority under which the Congregation has been
constituted. A book that has been condemned by the Congregation
must, however, be considered as having been condemned by the
Church of which the Congregation is for this purpose the
authorised representative.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account