The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
The Advocate-General Omer Talon, in an address delivered in 1647
before the Parliament of Paris, says: “We are prepared to recognise
and to accept the authority of the pope but neither the authority nor
the jurisdiction of the Congregation or of the Curia.” The Chancellor
d’Aguesseau writes in 1710: “It is well understood that the Roman Index
carries no authority in France where, while the primacy of the pope
is accepted, the authority of the Congregation of cardinals is not in
force.”[34]
Bossuet writes in regard to such a papal brief:[35] “We hold that these
constitutions are not binding in a French diocese until (and unless)
they have been published by the bishop.” Fénelon says: “We are not
willing through the acceptance of a papal brief to acknowledge the
authority (for France) of either the Index or Inquisition.”
As before stated, within the dominions of Spain, the Spanish Indexes
alone were accepted as authoritative, and the Spanish authorities
very frequently refused to condemn books that had been prohibited
by the editors of Rome. In other of the States classed as Catholic,
the authority of the Roman censorship was in like manner contested.
In 1759, Charles Alexander, Stadtholder of Lorraine, prohibited the
printing or sale of certain theological treatises by Dens, on the
ground that these asserted the authority of the _Bulla Coenae_,
and of the Roman censorship and the immunity of the bishops, and that
this constituted an assault on the authority of the emperor and on the
general policy of the Netherlands.
[Sidenote: Later Heresiarchs.]
=4. The Continuation of Class I, 1603–1876.=--The list of heretical
authors of the first class, all of whose works (past and future) were
condemned, were, in the first group of Roman Indexes, printed without
change or additions. The authorities do not appear to have considered
the later heretical writers to be entitled to the dignity of being
classed as heresiarchs. In the Decree of 1603, the name of Frac.
Guicciardini and that of Peter Frider are added by the Roman editors
to Class I; but these constitute the only additions for the series
of years given. On the other hand, new Spanish Indexes of this class
receive from decade to decade continued additions.
Among the authors, all of whose writings were prohibited in Indexes
printed prior to Alexander VII (1664), may be noted Hugo Broughton
(of Oxford), Thomas White (of London), Ludwig de Dieu, Gregorius
Richter, Giordano Bruno, Claudius Salmasius, J. B. Poza. Between 1664
and 1756, the list includes among the more noteworthy names, the
German writers J. H. Buddaeus, Georg. Calixtus, J. H. Heidigger; the
Hollanders Jo. Clericus, Simon Episcopius, Jac. Laurentius, and Lambert
Velthuysen; the Frenchmen J. Daillé, Ch. Drelincourt, Jean d’Espagne;
the Englishmen G. Bull (Bishop of St. Davids), W. Cave, J. Lightfoot,
Henricus Morus, J. Prideaux, and Thomas Hobbes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account