The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
In 1673, Louis XIV made claim for a material extension of the rights
of the Crown over the appointments in the French dioceses and for the
control of the property of the French Church. This declaration of the
King brought about a sharp conflict with Innocent XI, which continued
until 1682. In that year, a statement of principles arrived at by the
Gallican Church and presented in four articles brought the earlier
issue to a close. As a result of this first contest, one or two French
publications came into the Index. Among these was a treatise by the
Jesuit Rapin (published anonymously), prohibited in 1680. As late as
1710, was prohibited, by a brief of Clement XI, a volume by Andoul
on the matter of the Regalia rights. This papal brief the Parliament
of Paris refused to confirm and, in 1712, the Inquisition therefore
condemned the declaration that had been issued by the Parliament.
A similar course of condemnations had taken shape in 1680, in which
year a previous letter or enactment of the Parliament had been in like
manner condemned by the Inquisition of Rome. In 1682, the assembly of
the French clergy presented a conclusion in support of the contention
of the Crown in regard to the Regalia rights, which conclusion was
expressed in the following declaration:
I. To the pope has been given by God no authority over civil matters
of State. In these matters, kings and princes are subject to no
ecclesiastical authority, and they cannot either directly or indirectly
be brought under the control of the Church, nor can their subjects be
freed through any ecclesiastical intervention from the loyalty and
obedience due from them to their civil rulers.
II. The pope possesses full control in spiritual affairs, as specified
in the conclusions arrived at during the fourth and fifth sessions of
the Council of Constance. The Church of France takes the ground that
these conclusions arrived at in the council did not apply only to the
time of the schism but remained of binding authority.
III. The Apostolic authority is always to be exercised subject to the
restrictions of the canon law; and as far as France is concerned, the
laws of the monarchy and the old customs and regulations of the French
Church are not to be interfered with.
IV. It is the case that in matters of faith, the decision of the
pope retains a controlling influence and his decrees are rightly
to be issued to all the churches of the world. The papal judgment
is, however, not to be held as infallible, final, or not open to
modification unless and until it has secured the assent of the Church
universal, such assent as is expressed through the conclusions of the
general council.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account