The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
In 1684, 1685, and 1687, Innocent XI prohibited in special briefs
the Church history of Alexander; in 1685, an historical treatise by
Neimburg; in 1687, the same author’s biography of Gregory I, and
in 1689 a group of other of his writings. Between 1662 and 1693, a
series of treatises by de Launoy on Church history and Church law were
prohibited. In 1688, a brief of Innocent XI prohibits the treatise
on Church law of Dupin, and in 1693, the Inquisition prohibits the
_Bibliothèque_ of the same author. Later, the remainder of his
works came into the Index. In 1707, the writings of Tillemont were
denounced, but were saved from prohibition through a protest on the
part of certain Roman scholars. The Church history of Fleury escaped
the Index and of his works on Church law, only the _Catéchisme
Historique_ was prohibited and with a _d.c._ The learned Mabillon
came under consideration with the Index authorities more than once.
In 1703, a treatise of Mabillon, which had to do with the misuse and
misinterpretation of certain relics taken from the Roman catacombs, was
sharply criticised but escaped formal prohibition with the instruction
that Mabillon must produce an improved edition. His _Traité des Études
Monastiques_ was prohibited in the Italian edition. The Church history
of the French Jesuit Avrigny, covering the period of 1600–1718, was
prohibited on the ground of its Gallican views. Through a special brief
was condemned, in 1740, the translation by Le Courayer of Sarpi’s
_History of the Council of Trent_. Benedict XIV decided to recall the
prohibition of the Church history of Alexander, but at the same time
placed on the Index a series of treatises of Roncaglia the conclusions
in which were practically identical with those of Alexander.
Among the works condemned by the State may be cited:
Bellarmin, _Tractatus de potestate summi Pontificis in temporalibus_,
Rome, 1610, condemned under a decree of the Parliament of Paris
in November, 1610, on the following ground: _Contenant une fausse
et détestable proposition, tendante à l’éversion des puissances
souveraines ordonnées et établies de Dieu, soulévement des sujets
contre leurs princes, soustraction de leur obéissance, induction
d’attenter à leurs personnes et états, troubler le repos et la
tranquillité publique_.
Casaubon, Isaac, _De libertate ecclesiastica_. This book was condemned
by Henry IV, who undertook to have collected and destroyed all the
copies that had been brought into print.
Charron, Pierre, _Traité sur la sagesse_, Bordeaux, 1661. The first
edition was condemned by the Sorbonne until it should have been
expurgated. The later revised editions secured approval.
[Sidenote: Works Connected with the Gallican Church]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account