The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
=5. England and the Papacy.=--On the 25th of February, 1570, Sixtus V
issues his Bull against Queen Elizabeth, a copy of which Bull was, on
May 15th, nailed on the door of the palace of the Bishop of London. The
Pope describes Elizabeth as “a bastard and usurper,” the “persecutor
of God’s saints.” He declares that it would be “an act of virtue to
be repaid with plenary indulgence and forgiveness of all sins, to
lay violent hands upon Elizabeth and to deliver her into the hands
of her enemies.” He declares Philip of Spain to be the rightful King
of England and the Defender of the Faith. In the same year, Cardinal
Allen, an Englishman, printed in Antwerp a pamphlet entitled _An
Admonition to the Nobility and People of England and Ireland_, in
which, says Motley, Queen Elizabeth is “accused of every crime and vice
that can pollute humanity.” These charges are set forth with “foul
details unfit for the public eye in these more decent days.”
[Sidenote: The English Oath of Allegiance 1606–1853]
An important question in the relations between the Papacy and England
that called for attention under Paul V, was the issue that arose with
James I of England after the discovery of the Gunpowder Plot. An
order had been issued by King James in July, 1606, for a fresh oath
of allegiance to be taken by English Catholics. The Pope forbade the
Catholics to take this oath because it included the statement that
the claim of the Pope to have the right to depose kings and princes
and to absolve their subjects from allegiance was godless, infamous,
and heretical. The several statements brought into print on behalf
of King James in defence of the wording of the oath, were themselves
condemned by the Inquisition. The treatises of the English Catholics,
William and John Barclay and Thomas Preston (“Roger Widdrington”),
in reply to the defence by Bellarmin of the papal contentions, were
promptly placed upon the Index in connection with a long series of
later monographs on the same subject. The oath of allegiance was, under
Urban VIII in 1626, and later under Innocent X and Alexander VII, again
declared to be invalid. Towards the end of the 18th century, an oath
of allegiance substantially identical was, however, approved by six
theological faculties in England and by the Apostolic vicar in England
and this decision was accepted without protest by Rome. In the oath of
allegiance (which is not to be confused with the oath of supremacy, the
latter not being required from his Catholic subjects) James required
the Catholics to acknowledge that he was the rightful King of England,
that the pope had no authority to dispossess him or to incite a foreign
prince to war against him or to pardon his subjects for disobedience to
British law. They were further called upon to swear that, irrespective
of any papal decrees of deposition or any threat of excommunication,
they would remain loyal to the King, and further they were to declare
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account