The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)Putnam, George Haven
History
The censorship of the Church of Rome and its influence upon the production and distribution of literature, volume 2 (of 2)
Putnam, George Haven
Freedom of the press; Liberty of conscience; Prohibited books
=7. Italian Protestant Writings.=--During the 17th and 18th centuries,
Protestant writings printed in Italian were published chiefly in
Switzerland. The only author of this group whose work came into any
general circulation was Pincenino, a preacher in Soglio. Four of his
controversial treatises were prohibited by the Inquisition between the
years 1704–1714, and the publication of these brought out a number
of replies from Catholic theologians. The name of Vicenzo Paravicino
came into the Index in connection with a number of translations of
French Protestant writings, and also with editions of the Scriptures
printed in the vernacular. Edwin Sandys, a son of the Archbishop of
York (who is himself listed in Class I), printed, without his name, in
1605, and with his name in 1629, a treatise entitled _A View of the
State of Religion in the Western Part of the World, wherein the Roman
Religion and the pregnant Policies of the Church of Rome to support
the same are notably displayed, with other memorable Discoveries and
Commemorations_. The French and German translations of the book,
printed in Geneva in 1625 and 1626, were both condemned.
In 1621, was prohibited a history, printed in 1620, by Luglio (or
Paravicino) of the persecution and massacre by the Papists of the
Protestants of Valtellina. This has to do with one division of the long
series of persecutions of the Waldenses.
=8. Philosophical Writings, Natural Science, and Medicine,
1660–1750.=--In 1663, the Congregation of the Index prohibits with
a _d.c._ the chief writings of Descartes (1596–1650); and in 1722
prohibits with no restriction his _Meditationes_. This second
prohibition was issued some eighty years after the publication of the
work. Reusch[47] explains that the prohibition of 1663 was intended
to cover only specific divisions or propositions contained in these
writings, but no specification was made by the Congregation as to
the passages charged with heresy nor was any expurgated edition ever
brought into print. The commentators on Descartes point out that in any
case it would not have been practicable, without practically destroying
the entire statement of his system, to modify or correct the statements
that had evoked criticism. The chief objection raised by the Roman
critics was the view taken by Descartes of the philosophy of Aristotle.
It seems probable that in the case of this particular work the use of
the term _d.c._ did not indicate any expectation that the work would be
issued in an expurgated edition, but was intended simply to express the
condemnation in somewhat milder form. The works of Nicholas Malebranche
(1638–1715) were, with hardly an exception (although not under the
term _Opera omnia_), prohibited; but the philosophical writings
of Gassendi, Mersenne, and Maignan, writings expressing the same
general school of thought, escaped the Index. In 1772, the writings
of the Neapolitan Grimaldi, in reply to the treatise issued in 1694
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account