The ceramic art of Great Britain from pre-historic times down to the present day, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b being a history of the ancient and modern pottery and porcelain works of the kingdom and of their productions of every classJewitt, Llewellynn Frederick William
History
The ceramic art of Great Britain from pre-historic times down to the present day, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b being a history of the ancient and modern pottery and porcelain works of the kingdom and of their productions of every class
Jewitt, Llewellynn Frederick William
Pottery, British -- History
The body of the Chelsea china is very frequently uneven--_i.e._
it has often the appearance of being unequally mixed. One of its
peculiarities is that it would bear no fresh exposure to the heat
of the kiln, and consequently could not be re-painted and altered.
The second application of heat would most probably end in the entire
cracking and destruction of the piece. The body was not so compact as
the Derby, and of very different general character from Worcester.
The earliest examples made at Chelsea I believe to have been the
ordinary white with blue patterns, after the Delft and other makes; and
in these early days no marks were used. The glaze, too, was somewhat
thick and clumsy, and unevenly laid on. A little later on, Oriental
patterns were copied very successfully, both in blue and white and in
mixed colours, and the potting became careful and less clumsy. Some
early specimens of cups and saucers copied from Oriental patterns,
which I have seen, are remarkably well potted, and bear a wonderfully
close resemblance to the originals, both in body and in ornamentation.
The best Oriental specimens which could be had were, however, used
as models, as were also those of France and Germany; and very soon
the articles produced at Chelsea most successfully rivalled the
best productions of Dresden and Sèvres, both in modelling, potting,
colouring, and glazing. The colours were remarkably fine and vivid; and
as only the best artists were employed as painters, the pieces produced
were extremely choice and good. Many of the landscapes, of which
Boreman (or Bowman) was for a long time the chief painter, are in most
exquisite taste, both in colouring and choice of subject. The groups of
figures, historical, mythological, or otherwise, are, too, remarkably
fine, and evince a correct taste and a high degree of manipulation on
the part of the artists employed. In modelling, Bacon, Nollekins, and
many other of the most eminent men were employed, and the figures they
produced were of the highest possible degree of beauty.
In flowers and insects, the Chelsea painters were particularly happy
and successful, and they had a peculiar “knack” in “accidental
arrangement” which produced a most pleasing effect. Thus, on a plate or
dish, the little groups or single sprigs of flowers were often thrown
on, as it were, “hap-hazard” along with butterflies, bees, lady-cows,
flies, moths, and other insects, and thus produced a pleasing, because
an apparently unstudied, effect. The raised flowers, arranged on vases
and other ornamental pieces, are usually of extremely good character,
and are well painted; and the birds and figures which are introduced
along with them are also very nicely and carefully modelled.
[Illustration: Figs. 374 and 375.--Figures in the Museum of
Practical Geology.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account