The ceramic art of Great Britain from pre-historic times down to the present day, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b being a history of the ancient and modern pottery and porcelain works of the kingdom and of their productions of every classJewitt, Llewellynn Frederick William
History
The ceramic art of Great Britain from pre-historic times down to the present day, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b being a history of the ancient and modern pottery and porcelain works of the kingdom and of their productions of every class
Jewitt, Llewellynn Frederick William
Pottery, British -- History
The vase, which has been broken, has passed by purchase into the hands
of the Earl of Dudley, who, about the same time, became the purchaser,
for the sum of £2,000, of the famous vase belonging to the late Earl of
Chesterfield.
The earliest specimens of Chelsea ware have no mark, and can only be
judged by the body, the general style of workmanship, and the glaze.
But it is difficult correctly to appropriate many examples, especially
those in which the _painting_ alone was Chelsea work on foreign
bodies. In many of the old examples the marks produced by the triangle
or tripod are said to be indicative of the Chelsea works; but this is
by no means to be relied on, as the same appearances are frequently
found on the productions of other work.
[Illustration: Fig. 377.--Museum of Practical Geology.]
The general distinctive mark of Chelsea is an anchor--sometimes drawn
with the pencil, at others raised from a hollow mould; and this is
used either singly, two together, or in conjunction with one or more
daggers. It is usually said that the raised anchor is the oldest mark;
but this can scarcely be depended on, for instances are known where, on
the same set, the _raised_ anchor appears on some of the pieces,
while the anchor drawn with the pencil occurs on others.[62] This being
the case, it is difficult to decide which is the oldest; but, judging
from the workmanship of the specimens I have examined, I should feel
inclined to say that the earliest mark was the simple plain anchor,
drawn on the piece with the hair pencil, in the colour which the
workman happened to have in use at the time. It has been asserted that
the mark of the best kind of porcelain was an anchor in gold, and of
the inferior an anchor in red. This is, however, erroneous: the quality
of the body had nothing whatever to do with it, and I believe the
golden anchor is never found on pieces except where gold is used in the
ornamentation. The raised anchor appears on the cup and saucer.
[Illustration]
[Illustration: Fig. 378.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account