The ceramic art of Great Britain from pre-historic times down to the present day, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b being a history of the ancient and modern pottery and porcelain works of the kingdom and of their productions of every classJewitt, Llewellynn Frederick William
History
The ceramic art of Great Britain from pre-historic times down to the present day, Volume 2 (of 2) : $b being a history of the ancient and modern pottery and porcelain works of the kingdom and of their productions of every class
Jewitt, Llewellynn Frederick William
Pottery, British -- History
_Charles Bagnall_, of Shelton, who had previously been
with Joshua Heath, was a potter of considerable experience, in
the middle of last century. He was probably a son of the potter
of the same name, who was a maker of butter-pots in Burslem in
1710–15. He became one of the partners in the New Hall Works a
century ago. The family has been connected with Staffordshire
for many generations.
The company, being thus formed, purchased the patent right from
Richard Champion, who removed into Staffordshire to superintend the
establishing of the new works in that county. The first operations of
the company were conducted at the works of one of the partners, Anthony
Keeling, at Tunstall, the pottery formerly belonging, as just stated,
to his father-in-law, Enoch Booth. Tunstall at this period was a mere
small street, or rather roadway, with only a few houses--probably
not more than a score--scattered about it and the lanes leading to
Chatterley and Red Street. To this spot, the forerunner of the present
large and important town, Cookworthy’s patent was brought, and here,
with the experienced potters who had become its purchasers, and
under the management of Champion, who had produced such exquisite
specimens of art at Bristol, and who had been induced, as a part of
the arrangement, to superintend the manufacture, the first pieces
of china made in Staffordshire, with the exception of the trial
pieces of Littler, were produced. To accommodate the new branch of
manufacture at Keeling’s pot-works some alterations of course became
necessary, and thus it was some little time before the partners had
the satisfaction of seeing anything produced under the patent-right
which they had purchased. Among the partners, too, some disagreements
arose, which ended in John Turner and Anthony Keeling withdrawing
from the concern, and about 1780 Keeling is said to have removed to
London. This withdrawal and disagreement caused the remaining partners
to remove their work from Keeling’s premises, and they took a house
in Shelton, known as “Shelton Hall,” afterwards the “New Hall,” in
contradistinction to the “Old Hall,” celebrated as being the birthplace
of Elijah Fenton, the poet. At this time Shelton Hall, which had been
purchased in 1773 of Alice Dalton, widow, (who had inherited it from
her brother, Edward Burslem Sundell,) by Humphrey Palmer, was occupied
by his son, Thomas Palmer, as a pot-works. In 1777, Humphrey Palmer,
intending a second marriage with Hannah Ashwin, of Stratford-on-Avon,
gave a rent-charge of £30 on the Hall and pot-works, and a life
interest in the rest of the estate, as a dower to that lady, reserving
the right for his son, Thomas Palmer, the potter, to get clay and marl
from any part of the estate for his own use. In 1789, Humphrey Palmer
and his wife being both dead, the estate passed to their infant and
only child, Mary Palmer, of whose successor’s executors, after some
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account