The Ceremonies of the Holy-Week at RomeBaggs, Charles Michael
Religion
The Ceremonies of the Holy-Week at Rome
Baggs, Charles Michael
Catholic Church. Officium Hebdomadae Sanctae; Holy Week services
SS. Bartholomew and Thaddaeus were the first apostles of Armenia:
but it was not till the beginning of the 4th century, that the whole
country became Christian in consequence of the divine blessing, which
attended the zealous exertions of S. Gregory surnamed the Illuminator.
In the 6th century great numbers of the Armenians were infected with
the heresy of Eutyches, who denied that there were two natures in
Christ: and to this error they afterwards added some others. In the
pontificate of John XXII, about the year 328, a zealous Dominican
bishop, called Bartholomew of Bologna, went as a missionary among
them; and many of the Eutychians or Monophysites returned to the bosom
of the Catholic church. In the 16th century the Catholics were so
furiously persecuted by Zachary, a schismatical patriarch, that they
fled and took refuge in other countries. They have at present two
establishments at Rome, one of the Antonian monks at the church of
S. Gregory Illuminator, behind the colonnade of S. Peter's; and a
national _ospizio_ at S. Biagio in strada Giulia.
[Sidenote: their liturgy.]
"The Armenians," says Palmer "have only one liturgy, which is written
in the ancient Armenian language, and has been used by them from time
immemorial. The whole groundwork and order of the Armenian liturgy
coincides with the Caesarean, as used in the time of Basil. This
liturgy has, like most others, received many additions in the course
of ages. There are several prayers extracted from the liturgy of
Chrysostom, and actually ascribed to him" Vol. 1, Liturgy of Armenia.
"The liturgy of Basil can be traced with tolerable certainty to the
4th century. Striking as are some of the features, in which it differs
from that of Antioch, it is nevertheless evidently a superstructure
raised on that basis: the composition of both is the same, i.e. the
parts, which they have in common, follow in the same order. The same
may be said of the Constantinopolitan liturgy, commonly attributed to
S. Chrysostom, of that of the Armenian church, and of the florid and
verbose composition in use among the Nestorians of Mesopotamia. So
that the liturgy of Antioch, commonly attributed to S. James, appears
to be the basis of all the oriental liturgies". Tracts for the Times,
N. 63. The author then proceeds to state the grounds of the belief
that the liturgies of Antioch, Alexandria, Rome and Gaul were of
Apostolic origin; concluding thus "It may perhaps be said without
exaggeration, that next to the holy scriptures they possess the
greatest claims on our veneration and study". Padre Avedichian
observes in his preface to the Armenian liturgy, that it was probably
compiled by John _Mandagunense_, an Armenian patriarch of the fifth
century.
[Sidenote: Armenian high-mass.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account