Boys -- Fiction; City and town life -- Fiction; Newspaper employees -- Fiction
He had spoken, therefore, and spoken to the point. It had made a very
disastrous showing for the owner, although the editor avoided distinct
averments. He permitted it to be seen that the manager had given cause
for the strongest inferences against him, even to the extent that
he had procured the destruction of his own theatre for the sake of
securing the money for which it was insured. The point that struck
Ned's attention chiefly was the declaration that the boy who had been
accused of complicity in the crime and arrested had been bailed by
parties who were total strangers to the prisoner and all his friends.
When interviewed, one of these sureties, a well-known broker, had
given the most casual answers, excusing himself by reason of a flurry
in certain stocks in which his customers were largely interested, and
which absorbed his attention. The other bondsman, a brother of the
broker, admitted frankly and boldly that he had never seen the boy till
he went on his bond, and "wouldn't know him now from a gate-post;"
and although he and his brother had acted entirely on their own
responsibility in the matter and would make good the bond should the
boy forfeit the bail, they undertook the liability solely to oblige Mr.
Gorham, their close friend, who did not desire to keep so young a lad
imprisoned so long a time, while there was still doubt of his guilt,
and who had even offered to stand in behind them and pay the money
himself should the boy give them the slip. Thus, the editor argued, Mr.
Gorham played the double part of prosecutor and in effect bondsman for
the prisoner.
Ned's hand shook. So it was to Manager Gorham he was indebted for his
liberty. He could not for his life imagine why Gorham had come to his
relief. But he was sharp enough to see, when it had been put before
the mind in this plain way, that most outsiders would take the same
view of it that the editor did; it was evidently the journal's opinion
that the manager feared that the boy, if refused bail, would speak out
and accuse him of himself burning or procuring the destruction of the
building. The editor concluded, perhaps by way of vindicating his own
courage and "taking the dare," by advising the insurance companies to
pay nothing till their investigations should have been pushed in this
direction, and he recommended the owner of the theatre to the kind
attention of the grand jury and the attorney for the State.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account