The changing world, and lectures to theosophical students.: Fifteen lectures delivered in London during May, June, and July, 1909Besant, Annie
Religion
The changing world, and lectures to theosophical students.: Fifteen lectures delivered in London during May, June, and July, 1909
Besant, Annie
Theosophy; Theosophy -- Study and teaching
But now, supposing I ask you to go to the people of other religions for a
moment, the ancient religions that we find in the eastern world. Suppose
I ask a member of the most ancient of those, the Hindū faith: “Do you
recognise in your religion one supreme World-Teacher above all religions,
and not belonging to one exclusively—a universal Teacher?”—he would say,
“of Gods and men”; over here you would say, “of Angels and men,” because
the word there, Deva, is equivalent to your word Angel. He would at once
say: “Why, yes; of course we recognise one Supreme Teacher at the head
of all spiritual life and impulse, and we call him (pardon me if I use
for the moment their name) the Jagat-Guru—the World-Teacher.” Supposing
I went to another great religion there—the Buddhist—and I asked a member
the same question: “Do you recognise in your religion a Supreme Teacher?”
his answer would at once be, “Why, of course we do. There is only one
who holds the place of Teacher over all Gods and all men; one Teacher
only who is the Teacher of the world. We call Him the Bodhisattva—the
Wisdom-Truth.” No nobler name could be given to Him; He is the Wisdom and
the Truth; not the Buddha, as you may have expected me to say; He was
not the Teacher. When He reached Buddhahood He passed away from earth.
It is while He is going onwards to Buddhahood that He is known by this
name of Wisdom-Truth, or Boddhisattva. During the whole of that period
of teaching He has this name; and then when the supreme illumination
comes to Him his office is finished, and He passes away from earth. Of
course, as we know, the last Buddha remained in his body for some time,
still teaching, but none the less the office of the Teacher is not to the
Buddhist the Buddha, but he who is to be the Buddha—what you would call
the Christ glorified and ascended, not the Christ on earth teaching and
suffering. It is interesting to notice how in the various religions these
same points arise and these same differences are seen under different
names, so that we see that in these two greatest of eastern religions a
Supreme Teacher is recognised. Now, from the occult standpoint, it is
that Teacher who came as the Christ; and, supposing that all Christian
people recognised that fact, they would reach the hearts of the eastern
world far better than they do now, if, instead of telling them they must
worship the Christ, they would say to them, “You are already worshipping
Him under a different name,” which is supremely true; for it is the same
Being who holds that office through all these thousands of years, the
same supreme Perfection. He only comes into manifestation in order to
help His younger brethren; He leaves that body when its utility for the
moment is over; when, being so great in comparison with the people to
whom He came, they could no longer tolerate His presence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account