In the first flow of their indignation, the boys, freely ringing the
changes of rebellion, had avowed to one another that they would
acquaint the dean with the head-master’s favouritism, and request his
interference--as too many of us do when things happen that annoy us.
We are only too prone to speak out our mind, and to proclaim what our
remedy or revenge shall be. But when our anger has subsided, and we see
things in their true light, we find that those boasts were only loud
talking, and cannot be acted upon. Thus it was with the Helstonleigh
college boys. They had hurled forth indignation at the master, had
pretty nearly conned over the very words in which they should make known
their grievance to the dean; but when the practical part came to be
considered, their courage oozed out at their fingers’ ends. The mice,
you remember, passed a resolution in solemn conclave that their enemy,
the old cat, should be belled: an excellent precaution, and only wanting
one small thing to render it efficient--no mouse would undertake to do
it.
To prefer a complaint to the dean of their head-master was a daring
measure; such as the school, with all its hardihood, had never yet
attempted. It might recoil upon themselves; might produce no good to the
question at issue, and only end in making the master their enemy. On the
other hand, the boys were resolved not to submit tamely to a piece of
favouritism so unjust, without doing something. In the midst of this
perplexity, one of them suddenly mooted the suggestion that a written
memorial should be sent to the head-master from the school collectively,
respectfully requesting him to allow the choice of senior to be made in
the legitimate order of things, by merit or priority, but not by favour.
Lame as the suggestion was, the majority were for its adoption simply
because no other plan could be hit upon. Some were against it. Hot
arguments prevailed on both sides, and a few personal compliments rather
tending to break the peace, had been exchanged. The senior boy held
himself aloof from acting personally: it was his place they were
fighting for. Tom Channing and Huntley were red-hot against what they
called the “sneaking,” meaning the underhand work. Gerald Yorke was
equally for non-interference, either to the master or the dean. Yorke
protested it was not in the least true that Lady Augusta had been
promised anything of the sort. In point of fact, there was no proof
that she had been, excepting her own assertion, made in the hearing
of Jenkins. Gerald gravely declared that Jenkins had gone to sleep and
dreamt it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account