The Chautauquan, Vol. 04, March 1884, No. 6Chautauqua Literary and Scientific Circle
History
The Chautauquan, Vol. 04, March 1884, No. 6
Chautauqua Literary and Scientific Circle
Chautauqua Institution -- Periodicals; Chautauqua Literary and Scientific Circle -- Periodicals
but space, duration and number; Penn derived the idea from the soul, and
ascribed it to truth and virtue, and to God. Locke declares immortality
a matter with which reason has nothing to do, and that revealed truth
must be sustained by outward signs and visible acts of power; Penn saw
truth by its own light, and summoned the soul to bear witness to its own
glory. Locke believed “not so many men in wrong opinions as is commonly
supposed, because the greatest part have no opinions at all, and do not
know what they contend for;” Penn likewise vindicated the many, but
it was because truth is the common inheritance of the race. Locke, in
his love of tolerance, inveighed against the methods of persecution as
“Popish practices;” Penn censured no sect, but condemned bigotry of all
sorts as inhuman. Locke, as an American lawgiver dreaded a too numerous
democracy; Penn believed that God is in every conscience, his light
in every soul; and therefore, stretching out his arms, he built—such
are his own words—“a free colony for all mankind.” This is the praise
of William Penn, that, in an age which had seen a popular revolution
shipwreck popular liberty among selfish factions, which had seen Hugh
Peters and Henry Vane perish by the hangman’s cord and the ax; in an age
when Sydney nourished the pride of patriotism rather than the sentiment
of philanthropy, when Russel stood for the liberties of his order,
and not for new enfranchisements, when Harrington and Shaftesbury and
Locke thought government should rest on property—Penn did not despair
of humanity, and, though all his history and experience denied the
sovereignty of the people, dared to cherish the noble idea of man’s
capacity for self-government. Conscious that there was no room for its
exercise in England, the pure enthusiast, like Calvin and Descartes, a
voluntary exile, was to come to the banks of the Delaware to institute
the “HOLY EXPERIMENT.”
WILLIAM H. PRESCOTT.
“To Prescott belongs the rare distinction of uniting solid merit
with extensive popularity. He has been exalted to the first class
of historians, both by the popular voice and the suffrages of the
learned. By avoiding all tricks of flippancy or profundity to
court any class of readers, he has pleased all.”—_E. P. Whipple._
“Mr. Prescott’s leading excellence is that healthy objectiveness
of mind which enables him to represent persons and events in
their just relation. The scenery, characters and incidents
with which his history deals, are all conceived with singular
intensity, and appear on his page instinct with their peculiar
life. The mind of the author yields itself with a beautiful
readiness to the inspiration of his subject, and he leads
the reader along with him through every scene of beauty and
grandeur in which the stirring adventures he narrates are
placed.”—_Review._
Isabella of Spain and Elizabeth of England.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account