The Chemistry of CookeryWilliams, W. Mattieu (William Mattieu)
Science
The Chemistry of Cookery
Williams, W. Mattieu (William Mattieu)
Cooking
Fuel, 88 lbs. dry pine wood 0 0 2¼
Wages of three cook maids, at 20 florins a year each 0 0 3⅔
Daily expense of feeding the three cook maids, at 10 creutzers
(3⅔ pence sterling) each, according to agreement 0 0 11
Daily wages of two men servants 0 1 7¼
Repairs of kitchen furniture (90 florins per ann.) daily 0 0 5½
---------
Total daily expenses when dinner is provided for
1,200 persons 1 15 2⅔
This amounts to 422/1200, or a trifle more than ⅓ of a penny for each
dinner of this No. 1 soup. The cost was still further reduced by the
use of the potato, then a novelty, concerning which Rumford makes the
following remarks, now very curious. ‘So strong was the aversion of the
public, particularly the poor, against them at the time when we began
to make use of them in the public kitchen of the House of Industry in
Munich, that we were absolutely obliged, at first, to introduce them by
stealth. A private room in a retired corner was fitted up as a kitchen
for cooking them; and it was necessary to disguise them, by boiling
them down entirely, and destroying their form and texture, to prevent
their being detected.’ The following are the ingredients of ‘Soup No.
2,’ with potatoes:
Weight
Avoirdupois. Cost.
lbs. oz. £ s. d.
2 _viertels_ of pearl barley 70 9 0 5 9-13/22
2 _viertels_ of peas 65 10 0 3 7⅝
8 _viertels_ of potatoes 230 4 0 1 9-9/11
Cuttings of bread 69 10 0 10 2-4/11
Salt 19 13 0 1 2½
Vinegar 46 13 0 1 5½
Water 982 15 --
Fuel, servants, repairs, &c., as before 0 3 5-5/12
-----------
Total daily cost of 1,200 dinners 1 7 6⅔
This reduces the cost to a little above one farthing per dinner.
In the essay from which the above is quoted, there is another account,
reducing all the items to what they would cost in London in November
1795, which raises the amount to 2¾ farthings per portion for No. 1,
and 2½ farthings for No. 2. In this estimate the expenses for fuel,
servants, kitchen furniture, &c. are stated at three times as much as
the cost at Munich, and the other items at the prices stated in the
printed report of the Board of Agriculture of November 10, 1795.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account