[63] Brinton, _Religions of Primitive Peoples_, p. 17. [64] Kotzebue, _A Voyage of Discovery into the South Sea and Bering’s Straits_, vol. iii., p. 173. [65] Spencer and Gillen, _Central Australia_, p. 51. [66] _Central Australia_, p. 264. [67] Westermarck, _History of Human Marriage_, p. 484. [68] Its secrecy is insured by its indecency. [69] William Ellis, _Polynesian Researches_, p. 257. [70] George Turner, _Nineteen Years in Polynesia_, p. 394. [71] Charlevoix, _History of Paraguay_, vol. i., p. 405. [72] Fison and Howitt, _The Kamilario and Kurnai_, p. 190. [73] Darwin, _Descent of Man_, p. 46. [74] John Moore Davis, “Aborigines of Australia,” in Brough Smyth, vol. ii., p. 311, _Aborigines of Victoria_. [75] William Ellis, _Tour through Hawaii_, p. 300. [76] Sir John Lubbock, _The Origin of Civilization_, p. 3. [77] Stevenson, _In the South Seas_, p. 38. [78] Lucien Young, U. S. N., _The Real Hawaii_, p. 78. [79] John Foreman, _The Philippine Islands_, p. 206. Dean C. Worcester, _The Philippine Islands_, p. 208. [80] _Mémoires sur les Chinois_, tome ii., p. 396. [81] Ts’in Chi Hoang, Emperor of China, 220–210 B. C., was King of Ts’in, 246–221 B. C. Hirth, p. 334. [82] Se Ma Ts’ien, _Traduits et Annotés_, par Edouard Chavannes, tome ii., p. 130. [83] H. A. Giles, _Chinese Biographical Dictionary_. [84] _Li-Ki_, chapter i. [85] _She-King_, part iii., book ii., ode 1., verse 3, translated by James Legge. [86] _She-King_, part i., book viii., ode 7, verse 3. [87] _Chu’un Ts’ew_, book v., year xix., par. 4. [88] _Ibid._, book x., year xii., par. 9. [89] Demetrius Charles Boulger, _History of China_, vol. ii., p. 314. Palatre, p. 6. [90] P. G. Palatre, _Annales de la Sainte-Enfance_, tome xii., p. 304. [91] _Lettres Edif._, vol. x., p. 363. [92] P. Gabriel Palatre, _L’Infanticide et l’Œuvre de la Sainte-Enfance en Chine_, p. 16. [93] _Te-i-lou_, tome i., 2^e partie, _Tao-yng-hoei-Koei-taio_, p. 16. [94] P. Gabriel Palatre, _L’Infanticide et l’Œuvre de la Sainte-Enfance en Chine_, p. 44, note No. 2, which reads: “Foochow—‘The Prefect and the local magistrates have within the last few days issued a stringent proclamation against the practice of female infanticide. It provides that all parents guilty of destroying a child shall be punished according to the law against the destruction of descendants, which, it seems, provides sixty blows and a year’s imprisonment, as the proper punishment. A midwife, who destroys a child, is to be punished by strangulation. Neighbours who know of the commission, and do not report it, are to be punished as accessories to murder; and the Tepo are to be punished in the same way. A vigorous execution of this proclamation would do much to remedy the evil; but it remains to be seen whether the proclamation is more than a periodical fulmination, with the probability that it is not.’ Foochow _Herald_.” Also note No. 1, p. 45, which reads: