The Choice Humorous Works, Ludicrous Adventures, Bons Mots, Puns, and Hoaxes of Theodore HookHook, Theodore Edward
General
The Choice Humorous Works, Ludicrous Adventures, Bons Mots, Puns, and Hoaxes of Theodore Hook
Hook, Theodore Edward
English wit and humor
The only subject of conversation now in England, and indeed
in all those parts of Europe where tyrants are not as _yet_
allowed to send in fellows with bayonets to stop people's mouths
whenever they mention my name, must be the coolness between me
and Byron, and it is proper the rights of it should be known,
which is better than folks going about with a he-said-this--and
then-he-said-t'other sort of report of it. The fact is, that
Byron is the aggressor, for he began first, as the children
say, and all about a piece of patrician pride, very unbecoming
among us radicals. Some time ago, seeing him in conversation
with the Earl of----, at the end of the Strada di----, I hopped
down the street, and, just to shew the intimacy which subsisted
between us, slapped him on the back with a "Ha! Byron, my boy!"
He darted at me one of his look-you-through sort of glances, and
turned from me without speaking; and it was not till after a
decided cut of eight or ten days that, wanting something done,
he sent for me. I went; he began by a tread-you to-dirtish, as
it were taking of me to task, said something about the "coarse
familiarity of your radicals;" and then told me that I might stop
and dine with him that day, which I did. You will gather from
this that these lords are not to be depended upon, they are but
a half and half sort of radicals--the cloven foot of nobility is
perpetually peeping out, they won't give altogether into that
hail-fellow-well-metishness, which we expect from them. Again: at
dinner that day, happening to say to him, "I and you, Byron, who
are called the Satanic School:" he cut me short unceremoniously,
and said, "Who the h--ll ever called _you_ Satanic?--Cockney, if
you please and reminded me of the fable of the apples swimming.
Now, putting radicalism out of the question, this was very
ungenteel from one great poet to another--then he is jealous of
me. We have had a disagreement about which of us should have
the most room to write in the Liberal Magazine. He wanted all;
which (though I never contradict him, or he'd have cut me long
ago.) I almost remonstrated against, so he allowed me a corner
here and there, as it were. Thus he flatly attributes our slow
sale to my poetry--then to my prose--and in short, he was lately
so insulting that I had "ever such a mind" (as we used to say
at school) to tell him the fault was all his own; for between
ourselves he has grown as stupid and as vulgar as the best of
us. But worst of all, I find he has been making a mere tool of
me, and he quizzes me to my very face. Some weeks ago I told
him I had thoughts of writing his life, to which he replied
with a smile, "Do;" but when I added that he ought in return to
write mine, he exclaimed with a sneer "Pooh!" and went away in a
turn-on-the-heel sort of fashion. But this is of a piece with
his refusing to call me Tasso and Ariosto in exchange for my
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account