The Christ: A Critical Review and Analysis of the Evidences of His ExistenceRemsburg, John E. (John Eleazer)
Religion
The Christ: A Critical Review and Analysis of the Evidences of His Existence
Remsburg, John E. (John Eleazer)
Jesus Christ -- Historicity; Jesus Christ -- Rationalistic interpretations; Rationalism
If some of these apocryphal Gospels had been accepted as canonical,
and the canonical Gospels had been rejected as apocryphal, these
canonical Gospels would appear as untruthful and foolish to Christians
as the apocryphal Gospels do.
510
Let us examine the religious teachings ascribed to Christ. For what
purpose was his blood shed?
"This is my blood of the New Testament which is shed for many"
(Mark xiv, 24).
"This cup is the New Testament in my blood, which is shed for you"
(Luke xxii, 20).
"This is my blood of the New Testament which is shed for many FOR
THE REMISSION OF SINS" (Matthew xxvi, 28).
The above is one of the most significant discrepancies in the
Bible. The Atonement is the chief doctrine connected with Christ
and orthodox Christianity. The text quoted from Matthew is the only
text in the Four Gospels which clearly teaches this doctrine. Two
other texts (Matthew xx, 28; John i, 29) are adduced in support of
it, but do not clearly teach it. Now Matthew has falsely ascribed
to Jesus the revelation of the Atonement, or Mark and Luke have
either ignorantly or intentionally omitted this greatest of Christian
doctrines. They contain no mention of the Atonement as understood by
orthodox Christians.
511
For whom did he say his blood was shed?
"This is my blood of the New Testament, which is shed for many
[interpreted by the church to mean all mankind]" (Mark xiv, 24).
"This cup is the New Testament in my blood, which is shed for you
[addressed to his disciples alone]" (Luke xxii, 20).
512
Was his blood really shed?
The crucifixion was not a bloody death, and aside from the
self-confuted story of John about blood and water flowing from his
corpse, the Evangelists do not state that a drop of blood was shed.
513
Christ, it is affirmed, was both God and man. Was it the human,
or the divine part of him that suffered death?
If only the human, this sacrifice was not an exceptional one, for
thousands have died for their fellow men. If the divine part was
sacrificed does God cease to exist?
514
His death is called an infinite sacrifice. If only the man died can
this be true?
The offering of a finite being, it must be admitted, would not
constitute an infinite sacrifice.
515
If the God was crucified does he suffer endless pain?
If not, then his suffering was not infinite, and the sacrifice in
this case was not an infinite one.
516
If God died, but subsequently rose from the dead, was there not an
interregnum when the universe was without a ruler?
If so, then it must be conceded that the existence of the universe
is not dependent upon the existence of God.
517
Are all mankind to be saved by Christ?
"And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men to me"
(John xii, 32).
"Many be called but few chosen" (Matthew xx, 16).
518
What does Paul affirm concerning the Atonement?
"Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures" (1 Corinthians
xv, 3).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account