The Christ: A Critical Review and Analysis of the Evidences of His ExistenceRemsburg, John E. (John Eleazer)
Religion
The Christ: A Critical Review and Analysis of the Evidences of His Existence
Remsburg, John E. (John Eleazer)
Jesus Christ -- Historicity; Jesus Christ -- Rationalistic interpretations; Rationalism
This is popularly regarded as one of the most admirable acts in
Christ's ministry. In the New Version the twelve verses relating it
are declared by the Oxford revisers to be an interpolation.
187
In the miracle of restoring the sight of the man born blind, what
did he tell the man to do?
"Go wash in the pool of Siloam" (John ix, 7).
"The Lord sent the blind man to wash, not in, as our version has it,
but at the pool of Siloam; for it was the clay from his eyes that
was to be washed off."--Smith's Bible Dictionary.
188
What is the meaning of the word "Siloam"?
John: "Which is by interpretation, 'Sent'" (ix, 7).
Which is not by interpretation "sent," but "aqueduct."
189
Who provoked the displeasure of the Pharisees by eating with unwashed
hands?
Matthew and Mark: The disciples of Jesus (Matt. xv, 1, 2; Mark vii,
1, 2).
Luke: Jesus himself (xi, 37, 38).
190
Of what nationality was the woman who desired Jesus to cast the devil
out of her daughter?
Matthew: "A woman of Canaan" (xv, 22).
Mark: "The woman was a Greek" (vii, 26).
191
What did his disciples say when he expressed his intention of feeding
the four thousand?
Mark: "And his disciples answered him, From whence can a man satisfy
these men with bread here in the wilderness? And he asked them,
How many loaves have ye? And they said, Seven" (viii, 4, 5).
Why should they be surprised at his intention of feeding four thousand
with seven loaves when but a few weeks before he had fed five thousand
with five loaves?
In regard to this miracle Rev. William Sanday, of England, author
of "Jesus Christ," the most important article in Scribners' "Bible
Dictionary," says: "Are the two Feedings of Mark to be regarded as
two events or one? Besides the general resemblance between the two
narratives, a weighty argument in favor of the latter hypothesis is,
that in the second narrative the disciples' question implies that
the emergency was something new. They could hardly have put this
question as they did if a similar event had happened only a few weeks
before." This is also the opinion of Dr. Schleiermacher.
192
After feeding the four thousand where did he come?
Matthew (Old Ver.): "Came into the coasts of Magdala" (xv, 39).
Matthew (New Ver.): "Came into the borders of Magadan."
193
Where does Mark say he came?
"Came into the parts of Dalmanutha (viii, 10).
Criticising this statement, the "Bible for Learners" says: "Mark
makes him journey still farther north, through the district of Sidon,
and then turn southeast to the lake of Galilee, pass some way down
its eastern shore apparently, and finally take ship and cross in
a southwesterly direction to Dalmanutha, where we meet him once
again. But the Evangelist's geography is open to suspicion, and we
are inclined to lay these apparently purposeless wanderings of Jesus
to the account of Mark's want of accuracy" (Vol. iii, p. 282).
194
What did he say to the Pharisees who asked for a sign?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account